>> In the UK, there's no right to bear arms, so people are pretty helpless against their oppressing government. There's a right to bear arms in the US and it doesn't seem to be helping them with their oppressive government.
Look into the Black Panthers. It actually does work quite effectively.
How? the Black Panthers were infiltrated and undermined by COINTELPRO and effectively destroyed from within, meanwhile the white supremacist capitalist system they fought against persists.
Their biggest success as far as I know is starting free school lunches in the US, but that wasn't at gunpoint.
The nightmare continues.
For now I am using 3rd party backup services that are (currently) promising me that my backups are encrypted by a key they do not have access to, or control over.
But can this even be believed in an age where these secret notices are being served to any number of companies?
I suppose the next step would be to ensure that files don't ever arrive in the cloud unencrypted, but I have yet to see a service that allows me to do this with the same level of convenience as, say, my current backup solution, which seamlessly backs up all my phones, my family members' phones, my laptops, their laptops etc.
I depend on having an offsite backup of my data. Which inevitably includes my clients' data also. Which I am supposedly keeping secret from outside access. So how does that work once everything becomes backdoored?
Why do pro-privacy tech folks on here act like Apple is some charity? Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. It is on citizens to use their democratic power to ensure their representatives act as the voting base wants. Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will.
> Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. Being a business does not remove ethical considerations. And I’m an environment where corporations are considered people, it seems reasonable to expect some degree of alignment with normal citizens. > Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will. The government is increasingly not a representation of the collecti…
Corporations are people in the legal sense not in any other philosophical way. Just like non-humans proposed for personhood, they are not entities expected to behave ethically. Like a dog, you set rules and apply punishments when they breach it. You don't argue ethics with a dog because they are not relevant to them
Ok, I am not very technical. Can someone help me understand this. I don't have Advanced data Protection on. Does that mean UK Gov can see my data now?
Potentially. It really just means your data is stored unencrypted, so anybody that has access to Apple's servers can access your data. I don't believe any government has open access to Apple's servers, but they can get a warrant.
Why do pro-privacy tech folks on here act like Apple is some charity? Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. It is on citizens to use their democratic power to ensure their representatives act as the voting base wants. Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will.
> Apple is a business. It won't fight a citizen's fight on your behalf. Being a business does not remove ethical considerations. And I’m an environment where corporations are considered people, it seems reasonable to expect some degree of alignment with normal citizens. > Apple's goal is to make money. The government is a representation of your will. The government is increasingly not a representation of the collecti…
> where corporations are considered people,
People always get this wrong. Corporations are not people. They just have certain rights like owning property. Corporate personhood != full personhood.