Live data from Hacker News

AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

kanenarraway.com

121–130 of 651 posts

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#121

I mostly skipped the technical questions in the last few interviews I have conducted. I have a conversation, ask them about their career, about job changes, about hobbies, what they do after work. If you know the subject, skilled people talk a certain way, whether it is IT, construction, sailing. I do rely on HR having, hopefully, done their job and validated the work history. I do have one technical question that st…

> blanking on a fifth

grep? (or ripgrep if allowed)

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#122
post #18

Interestingly I find AI is actually better at that kind of CS whiteboard question (implementing a binary search tree) than that "connecting middlewares to API" type task. Or at least, it's more straightforward to apply the AI, when you want a set of functions with clearly defined interfaces written - rather than making a bunch of changes across existing files.

I’ve wondered about the kind of person who starts white boarding with the pros and cons of several AI offerings. As if, confronted with a problem domain, they are choosing or hiring AI before architecture. As an interviewer, how should I adapt my questions? Something like, “How would you prompt it to add fuzzing?” “How would you prompt it to describe how each change might affect our stack?”

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#123
post #2

I never understood why Big Tech never setup contracts with all the SAT and ACT test centers across the country. Even before Zoom with Codepads it would have made sense for the recruiters to send potential candidates to a test center to do a pre assessment rather than waste time with engineers sitting on prescreen calls all day.

Another commenter on this called it “Licensing” but it’s more like credentialing to me.

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#124
This whole conversation is depressing me. when I left work a couple years ago due to health reasons, AI was just beginning to become a problem. Now, thanks to a clinical study, I may possibly be able to return to work, and it sounds like the industry has changed drastically.

Not looking forward to it.

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#125

I was asked by an SME to code on a whiteboard for an interview (in 2005? I think?). I asked if I could have a computer, they said no. I asked if I would be using a whiteboard during my day-to-day. They said no. I asked why they used whiteboards, they said they were mimicking Google's best practice. That discussion went on for a good few minutes and by the end of it I was teetering on leaving because the fit wasn't go…

Take a bow.

And my axe…

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#126
post #98

Licensing. We do the Leetcode interview in a controlled testing center. When you apply for a position, I look up your license number, then I know you can leetcode without wasting any of my developer resources on determining that.

Isn’t this basically triplebyte? I did their process and every company still wanted to do their leetcode interview after.

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#127

I've accidentally been using an AI-proof hiring technique for about 20 years: ask a junior developer to bring code with them and ask them to explain it verbally. You can then talk about what they would change, how they would change it, what they would do differently, if they've used patterns (on purpose or by accident) what the benefits/drawbacks are etc. If they're a senior dev, we give them - on the day - a small b…

Yep. I've also been using an AI-proof interview for years. We have a normal conversation, they talk about their work, and I do a short round of well-tested technical questions (there's no trivia, let's just talk about some concepts you probably encounter fairly regularly given your areas of expertise).

You can tell who's trying to use AI live. They're clearly reading, and they don't understand the content of their answers, and they never say "I don't know." So if you ask a followup or even "are you sure" they start to panic. It's really obvious.

Maybe this is only a real problem for the teams that offloading their interviewing skills onto some leetcode nonsense...

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#128

This whole conversation is depressing me. when I left work a couple years ago due to health reasons, AI was just beginning to become a problem. Now, thanks to a clinical study, I may possibly be able to return to work, and it sounds like the industry has changed drastically. Not looking forward to it.

I think that the effects at the moment are highly exaggerated in the tech media than the reality on the ground.

How long that will remain true is a very open question, where different folks have widely differing timelines on when they expect AI to have highly meaningful impacts.

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#129

This whole conversation is depressing me. when I left work a couple years ago due to health reasons, AI was just beginning to become a problem. Now, thanks to a clinical study, I may possibly be able to return to work, and it sounds like the industry has changed drastically. Not looking forward to it.

It hasn’t. Most businesses have continued operating the way they have for years.

SV Startup hiring is the most trendy and not representative.

Re: AI killed the tech interview. Now what?

#130
Never really liked leetbro interviews. Always reeked of “SO YOU THINK YOU CAN CODE BRO? SHOW ME WHAT YOU GOT!” The majority of my work over 10+ years of experience always relied on general problem solving and soft skills like collaborating with others. Not rote memorization of in order traversal.
Post reply on HN