Oh boy, a 6.1 inch screen. "Popular". Ugh. RIP any hopes of a small SE refresh.
They need that screen so they can fit a reasonable battery underneath... an unfortunate tradeoff
Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
41–50 of 857 posts
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#42Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#43iPhone SE: $429, 4.7-inch display, 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29, 5.09 ounces iPhone 16e: $599, 6.1-inch display, 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31, 5.88 ounces This is a major downgrade in every way for people who want the smallest possible iPhone.
But I have to say, I was more annoyed by the loss of touch ID than by the increase in screen size. While I like the smallest possible iPhone, my SE has not been very nice to use lately. Developers aren't testing their sites/apps on that screen size, and many sites/apps are getting really janky when run on a screen that small.
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#44Is this a replacement for the "SE" line? It seems similar to the previous SE models in that it's cheaper, uses an older body, and is released in an off month. The marketing copy in the OP also compares it to the older SE phones. I am guessing that's the end of the small phone line at Apple.
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#45[flagged]
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#46Oh boy, a 6.1 inch screen. "Popular". Ugh. RIP any hopes of a small SE refresh.
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#47Oh boy, a 6.1 inch screen. "Popular". Ugh. RIP any hopes of a small SE refresh.
Size matters for me : I'm looking for a compact Android phone, there is none now. Something close to the iPhone 12 mini.
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#48can I get it without the AI slop?
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#49You’ll have to pry the 13 mini from my cold dead hands…or just stop supporting it
Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e
#50Pro: action button Con(?): 60 Hz And the price hike again shows that Apple is the master of the "for just a few hundred dollars more, you can get...“ upsell to bigger iPhones.