Live data from Hacker News

In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

arstechnica.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

#41

Which just shows that DOGE is a lie, and not about government "efficiency" or cost savings. NASA is arguably a giant waste of taxpayer dollars. Very little of its activity tangibly benefits the vast majority of Americans, and much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds. The entire space exploration and manned spaceflight activiti…

Yeah, it’s also really a drag about how we have technology for crossing oceans and flying through the air. Imagine the savings we could have diverted to the rich if only we hadn’t squandered all of those resources learning how to do that useless stuff. After all, humans were just fine for millions of years before ships and airplanes.

Re: In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

#42
post #4

Elon is good buddies with a former Nasa director -- that director gave SpaceX their big break and backing when they were basically insolvent... I imagine conversations were had.

> Elon is good buddies with a former Nasa director Who specifically are you talking about here? > I imagine conversations were had. It wouldn’t surprise me if Jared Isaacman (Trump’s nominee for next NASA administrator, an obvious Musk pick) convinced Musk to call for a back-off. I imagine Isaacman would argue that if there are going to be any personnel cuts, that he get to decide who and how many, rather than inheri…

It’s Michael Griffin. Musk also named his kid after him allegedly.

Re: In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

#43

Which just shows that DOGE is a lie, and not about government "efficiency" or cost savings. NASA is arguably a giant waste of taxpayer dollars. Very little of its activity tangibly benefits the vast majority of Americans, and much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds. The entire space exploration and manned spaceflight activiti…

> much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds.

Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this:

NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0]

For the same year, NASA generated (again, roughly) $76 billion in economic output [1].

Every dollar of funding goes back into the economy three-fold. Doesn't really seem like a waste to me.

Also, NASA's operations in 2023 created/supported over 300,000 jobs to Americans[2]. Again, doesn't seem like a waste to me.

[0] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/fiscal-year-...

[1] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/final-fy23-n...

[2] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/nasa-fy23-ec...

Re: In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

#44

Which just shows that DOGE is a lie, and not about government "efficiency" or cost savings. NASA is arguably a giant waste of taxpayer dollars. Very little of its activity tangibly benefits the vast majority of Americans, and much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds. The entire space exploration and manned spaceflight activiti…

> much of what it does do could easily be replaced with a generative AI model that produces new space pictures for desktop backgrounds. Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this: NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0] For the same year, NASA generated (again, roughly) $76 billion in economic output [1]. Every dollar of funding goes back into the economy thr…

> Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this:

Only a little. The point is "waste" and "efficiency" are so subjective to be a near meaningless concepts. You could make the same points you did about many of the things Musk wants to cut, but they're not going to resonate to a tech audience like cutting NASA does. It's basically a temple of geek religion.

> NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0]

That money could fund a lot of housing assistance or healthcare.

Personally, I think the things that "engineers" like should be cut first instead of being protected.

Re: In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees

#45
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Government (local, federal, state) spending as a percentage of GDP is 34% and as a total amount is 6.75 trillion. According to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_the_num... there are ~756 billionaires in the US (interestingly the state-like region with the highest amount of billionaires per capita is Washington DC). The total wealth of these billionaires is ~6.72 trillion. I don't think th…

Are we going to ignore the fact that part of that government spending funded private companies owned by Musk? Wealth inequality in America is worse than any of its peer nations and has only been getting worse since the 80s (see Pew research on this). Americans on the ground feel this more than they feel the effects of bloated government spending that funds, well you know, stuff that's supposed to be in the public int…

"Are we going to ignore the fact that part of that government spending funded private companies owned by Musk?"

Elon musk has received ~$18 billion over a decade. In exchange he gave us the first broad market electric cars and reusable rockets which were lucrative outside of the public sector. While I have broad concerns about the money going in the pockets of the wealthy from government spending, this doesn't strike me as bad ROI. Just looking at the dollars and cents, the income/capital gains taxes paid by tesla/spacex workers+management over the last decade is almost certainly a substantially larger figure (I think Elon himself paid $11 billion in one year?) so the net "funding" of this "investment" from the government is a negative figure and this contributed to the balance sheet rather than subtracted from it.

While I may agree with you about certain problems we are seeing (e.g. wealth inequality), I think we disagree on the causes and solutions. I primarily blame government and would cite specifics such as 1 a slow down in housing construction that I blame on regulatory change (leading to large price gains which benefit established home owners) and 2 spending on bureaucracy that I view as generally going to well off people 3 skyrocketing cost of education which I generally blame on universities being enabled by incentives often from the government to act like a business and not a public good 4 increased cost of medical care which I generally view as a collection of market failings also caused by (in my view) bad policy (e.g. doctors are protected from immigrants taking their jobs due to the medical credentials not often being able to cross borders) 5 worse demographics (aging population requires more medical care and produces fewer workers). I believe you generally blame billionaires or the "very rich" who you feel are capturing a large share of the economy and I would be curious for you to lay out your case for this.

"You have to be extremely out of touch with reality and its consequences for real people if you think this is the right way to do it. The only people cool with this are prepubescents and immature adults who seem to think that life is like a video game full of NPCs and not of people who live actual meaningful lives like themselves."

I will acknowledge that often cuts are painful, chaotic, and impact real people. The nature of management for large organizations and in this case an enforced tight timeline due to political terms in my view make this inevitable and I am hopeful that there are long term positive outcomes that make the short term pain worthwhile. I don't think this makes me a prepubescent or immature adult and I don't view you or other people in life as an NPC. To be honest I view you as someone who is likely smart living a full life and who can probably be convinced with facts/figures along with a rational argument (although I will acknowledge that this takes time and happens over years / decades and not in a short conversation :D).

Post reply on HN