Should Open Source AI Mean Exposing All Training Data?
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: Should Open Source AI Mean Exposing All Training Data?
#2> the existence of complete training data is [...] not an absolute requirement [...] this OSI stance is widely regarded as a reasonable approach
That's definitely NOT the case for me and it's the reason why I now see the OSI as a joke. But feel free to make up your own definitions: Windows is open-source, the PlayStation is a car, and broccolis are good for cats (for a different definition of a broccoli).
Re: Should Open Source AI Mean Exposing All Training Data?
#3> the existence of complete training data is [...] not an absolute requirement [...] this OSI stance is widely regarded as a reasonable approach That's definitely NOT the case for me and it's the reason why I now see the OSI as a joke. But feel free to make up your own definitions: Windows is open-source, the PlayStation is a car, and broccolis are good for cats (for a different definition of a broccoli).
I almost agree, but BSD allow binary blobs. If it's open enough for BSD and OSI, ...
GPL request the source code.