> You get a tumor, a surgeon removes it.
That is not the same thing for traders and you know it.
> The economy gets a shock, a trader helps the market absorb it.
And in the process the trader "absorbs" and enrich themselves with more profits?
The whole point of my argument is about morals, a trader doesn't have to do what you just said, and why should they? It's all about money in the end without caring for the millions of people in society, traders can bet against the markets and win big, at the expense of the economy without helping anything or giving back to society.
In almost all cases, the traders win in the end, employees of other industries that are affected by the economy always lose, (jobs, income, taxes, etc.)
There is a reason why bankers, traders in Wall St in New York or 'The City' in London are disliked.