Live data from Hacker News

Dust from car brakes more harmful than exhaust, study finds

e360.yale.edu

1–10 of 465 posts

Re: Dust from car brakes more harmful than exhaust, study finds

#3
> researchers grew human lung cells in a lab and exposed them to dust from car brakes and from diesel tailpipes, finding that brake dust caused greater injury to the cells.

I couldn’t tell if the study found that car brakes are more harmful than exhausts, or that car brake chemicals are more harmful than exhaust fumes - but that may not be significant because they are produced in less quantities.

Re: Dust from car brakes more harmful than exhaust, study finds

#7
I think this is missing out on the big issue - tyre pollution which contains really nasty chemicals that inevitably get washed into rivers and waterways.

Also, car-shaped EVs often use regenerative braking which will reduce the amount of brake dust pollution, but with their increased weight and powerful torque, they produce a lot more tyre pollution than ICE vehicles.

https://earth.org/tyre-pollution/

Re: Dust from car brakes more harmful than exhaust, study finds

#9

I wonder if this means another advantage for EVs in terms of environmental friendliness.

Or even just HEV and PHEVs with slightly larger battery packs.

It’s not about battery pack. It’s about size of the electrical motor.

Re: Dust from car brakes more harmful than exhaust, study finds

#10

I wonder if this means another advantage for EVs in terms of environmental friendliness.

Or even just HEV and PHEVs with slightly larger battery packs.

You don't even need a huge battery pack for dynamic braking. It's the architecture of hybrid cars that allows them to regeneratively brake, even if the battery is full, by using the engine as a pump. Although this doesn't arise in practice, hybrids could dynamically brake down a grade of any length, which BEVs can't guarantee.
Post reply on HN