Live data from Hacker News

TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

tldw.tube

81–90 of 213 posts

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#81

What if we summarize all the information in the world into a few hundred volumes of human knowledge, then summarize those into a 10,000 pages book, then that into a 10 long form essays, then those into a 100,000 chars blog post, then that into a pamphlet and finally we summarize one more time into a single tweet.

Not a single tweet, but 10 brief sentences, as per the AI overlords:

1. The universe is vast, mostly empty, and runs on fundamental laws that we barely understand but exploit well.

2. Life is a self-replicating, entropy-defying phenomenon that emerged through chemistry, evolved through selection, and adapts through intelligence.

3. Humans are social primates who dominate the planet through cooperation, tool-making, storytelling, and an insatiable drive for meaning.

4. Societies form through shared beliefs, laws, and trade, but oscillate between progress and collapse due to power, greed, and ignorance.

5. Technology is humanity’s amplifier, accelerating knowledge, comfort, and destruction in equal measure, with unintended consequences at every turn.

6. Economies are trust-based systems of resource distribution, prone to cycles of boom, bust, innovation, and inequality.

7. Morality is a human construct, evolving with culture, often conflicting between collective well-being and individual freedom.

8. Knowledge is a fractal—deeper the dive, more there is to know—yet most wisdom is rediscovery of old truths in new contexts.

9. The future is uncertain but shaped by the tension between human ingenuity and our own worst tendencies.

10. The meaning of life? Whatever gets you up in the morning and lets you sleep at night.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a silly point of view. Instead what should they do? Post comments like this on HN? They clearly enjoy watching and digesting information from YouTube- the biggest platform for this. But people need to make money from it hence the ailment these these plugins remedy

>Instead what should they do? Read a book, touch grass, etc. >They clearly enjoy watching and digesting information from YouTube- the biggest platform for this. I'd probably enjoy heroin but I still choose not do take it because I know it's not good for me. What's your point?

>Read a book, touch grass, etc.

There's a ton of useful information that's only available in Youtube videos and not books such as DIY tutorials, repairs, etc.

Unfortunately, many helpful videos also include useless fluff. E.g. a "good" 10 minute video on how to disassemble a Samsung dryer to replace the heating element also has 2 extra minutes of "click my link to Nord VPN" and "please smash that Like button and subscribe". Therefore, tools using AI to remove the extra time-wasting fluff can help. There is no book in the public library or Amazon that will show the tricky steps to repair a Samsung dryer. It's Youtube videos uploaded by random people that has information like that.

My friend learned how to use her new Apple Watch by watching Youtube videos. Yes, there's official Apple documentation but it's hard to learn from a wall of text with static screen shots. In contrast, watching youtubers do live demonstrations with their fingers manipulating the screen accompanied by voiceover narration is easier to understand.

EDIT reply to: >When you've saved "years of watching" by using sponsorblock and 2x speed, that's not how you use YT. Sponsorblock saves 25% at most.

Your math is incomplete in your characterization of the gp you replied to because he also mentioned "DeArrow (de-clickbaits thumbnails and titles). That tool saves 100% of the watch time when the re-titled videos instantly informs him he can totally skip it.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#83

What if we summarize all the information in the world into a few hundred volumes of human knowledge, then summarize those into a 10,000 pages book, then that into a 10 long form essays, then those into a 100,000 chars blog post, then that into a pamphlet and finally we summarize one more time into a single tweet.

Not a single tweet, but 10 brief sentences, as per the AI overlords: 1. The universe is vast, mostly empty, and runs on fundamental laws that we barely understand but exploit well. 2. Life is a self-replicating, entropy-defying phenomenon that emerged through chemistry, evolved through selection, and adapts through intelligence. 3. Humans are social primates who dominate the planet through cooperation, tool-making, s…

> entropy-defying phenomenon

entropy-exploiting phenomenon

is a much better description as life does not defy any fundamental laws.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#84
Seems to use gpt-4o under the hood. I wonder if using Deepseek would make any difference in quality.

I used to have nice and detailed summaries with this app lasting many paragraphs. It used to be totally free and you could submit as many links as you wanted. However they started forcing you to wait dozens of hours between summaries or pay for credits. I haven't found a YouTube summarizer as high quality since.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.emote.yout...

I'm thinking one could replicate such a service pretty easily and be able to plug in your Deepseek API token instead. It would be convenient if such services let you "bring your own API key" so to speak, so you'd only have to manage one bank of credits. But it's understandable that lots of people want in on a slice of the AI pie right now.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#86
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Read a book I wanted to say something flippant, but dang with the halo on my shoulder urges me otherwise. so here goes: books can also full of filler crap and useless and outright wrong material. just because it's a different medium doesn't make it any better for wasting time. in fact, a bad book can waste weeks of your life whereas a bad video on YouTube could waste about 10 minutes. ultimately I approve of any to…

Books at least go through a minimal amount of vetting before they are published, and there are meaningful differences between forms of media. As McLuhan wrote: "The medium is the message".

Lol, no they don't.

If you have a pdf with enough words in it, you can go from that to a published paperback on Amazon in 15 minutes.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use SponsorBlock (be sure to enable all categories of blocking such as filler content, not just sponsors), DeArrow (de-clickbaits thumbnails and titles) and a video speed changer extension to enable much of your stated functionality, though of course not all. I've saved likely years of watching due to this combination.

How did your viewing experience change after using DeArrow? I'm curious because DeArrow has a great reputation, yet my gut feeling tells me that I should avoid watching clickbait videos altogether.

I tried DeArrow for a bit but I found that for some channels it actually made things worse - I mean it removed the clickbait, but some clickbait gave me a better idea of what the video was actually about than DeArrow's boring titles.

Overall it didn't improve the experience really.

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#88
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Read a book I wanted to say something flippant, but dang with the halo on my shoulder urges me otherwise. so here goes: books can also full of filler crap and useless and outright wrong material. just because it's a different medium doesn't make it any better for wasting time. in fact, a bad book can waste weeks of your life whereas a bad video on YouTube could waste about 10 minutes. ultimately I approve of any to…

Books at least go through a minimal amount of vetting before they are published, and there are meaningful differences between forms of media. As McLuhan wrote: "The medium is the message".

Maybe in the 1900s. Not any more

Re: TL;DW: Too Long; Didn't Watch Distill YouTube Videos to the Relevant Information

#89
Tried it on 3 random videos I watched, and the results were... mostly good, albeit mixed.

On the one hand, it got my video about a Mario & Luigi: Brothership glitch dead right, immediately listing where you'd need to die to get an item early and what you'd get out of it.

It also did an okay job summarising a Zelda dungeon analysis video by someone I'm subscribed to, with some info on why that dungeon was well-designed that clearly came from the video.

Unfortunately, it did a poor job at summarising a video about plagiarism in the YouTube speedrunning essay space, associating the problem with smaller creators rather than the person the video was about and leaving out far too many details to be useful.

This seems to confirm my assumptions about how an AI summariser would work in general; if the original media is a straightforward piece about one easily understandable topic, then it'll do fine and work about as well as a human would. If it's a longer piece with multiple points backed by various examples, then it'll struggle to summarise it in a way that makes sense.

Post reply on HN