Live data from Hacker News

The History of S.u.S.E

abortretry.fail

91–100 of 132 posts

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#91
One thing not made clear in that history was their role in ARM Linux. There was a guy there, I forget his name (I think it was Andy). We learned a lot about making an ARM compiler for CL from him. He really was the, at the low level, the one that help make ARM Linux happen.

Anyone remember his name? Definitely would like to give him a shout out.

It might have been Andreas Färber.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#92

My first introduction to linux was SuSE 7.2. Got it in the physical box from a local Borders bookstore. I think I was about 12-13 years old. Installed it on the family Gateway computer (PIII, 128mb ram).

I still have a full box of SuSE 7.3 on my shelf, the first (and only) Linux disto I've bought. :)

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#93

One thing I always found awesome is that even the very first versions, like "Linux Aktuell 4.x" from 1996 or so, already had full support for Braille terminals during installation. That made SuSE very usable for blind people, even installable, while for other operating systems you always needed someone to set the system up for you (and probably still do). I am not blind personally (and I don't know anybody who is), b…

I was working at S.u.S.E. at the time (in 1998) and there was a guy (I think he was an employee, but I might be wrong) on site who was blind, he and made sure the Braille terminals worked; yes I think also during installation.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#94

SuSE doesn’t get enough credit for the quality of the distribution. Transactional updates, serious work towards a reproducible distribution, nano as an excellent container runtime, stability under large workloads - it’s a nice piece of engineering.

> nano as an excellent container runtime

Out of curiosity, are you referring to MicroOS? I know they're written some container tools like catatonit but I haven't heard of nano.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The original name of the company was S.u.S.E. with the dots. "Software- und System-Entwicklung" (Software and system development)

> Software- und System-Entwicklung Wow that's like naming your cleaning company "Cleaning Company"

Or a company for developing software for microcomputers Microsoft?

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#96
post #85

SuSE doesn’t get enough credit for the quality of the distribution. Transactional updates, serious work towards a reproducible distribution, nano as an excellent container runtime, stability under large workloads - it’s a nice piece of engineering.

> SuSE doesn’t get enough credit for the quality of the distribution Maybe now. 7.2 had a bug where they showed one unit when partitioning drives and used another one when writing to disk. Ask me how i find out.

I think I've encountered bugs in every distro's installer from 24 years ago. Fortunately, in 86box it's less painful than I imagine you went through.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#97
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, Americans put "National" in front of everything. At least the German version suggests some level of awareness of a world beyond the borders.

National is generic, but many companies in the U.S. include America in their name.

It's generic only if the context isn't implied. In e.g. NBA, NHL etc. "national" means "American".

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Software- und System-Entwicklung Wow that's like naming your cleaning company "Cleaning Company"

Like OpenAI or IBM....or the best one..Oracle for a Database ;)

Or like MicroSoft - Microcomputer Software.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#99
post #66

After Red-Hat and Mandrake, it became my favourite home distro until Ubuntu came into the scene. Still have the SuSE 6.3 box, like it used to be common in those days. Yast is a great tool, and SusSE is one of the few distros that isn't stuck in the 1970's view of what means OS administration. Also an ideal candidate for the upcoming age of siloed countries, stuck in commercial wars.

> After Red-Hat and Mandrake, it became my favourite home distro until Ubuntu came into the scene.

I fucking loved Mandrake. And Red Hat on a PowerMac. It was a challenge but it was very rewarding when it worked. I had the opposite trajectory after that, though. I tried Ubuntu when it was new and shiny but ran into so many issues… Now I have been using OpenSuse continuously for about 6 years without complaint. Even the usual (though much rarer than it used to be) sticking point of Nvidia drivers are trivial to deal with by restoring snapshots.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like OpenAI or IBM....or the best one..Oracle for a Database ;)

Or like MicroSoft - Microcomputer Software.

Microsoft is a least correct but:

OpenAI = Not Open

IBM = International Business Machines with NON international character encoding (EBCDIC).

Oracle = NOT what you want from a database nor from a CIA project ;)

Post reply on HN