Live data from Hacker News

U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

washingtonpost.com

171–180 of 331 posts

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#171

I keep saying this, and nobody believes me, but I'm just going to keep trying: These things happen because so often we focus the privacy conversation on corporations, which is exactly where the governments want it to be. My controversial but strong opinion is that privacy from corporations matters very little, but privacy from governments matters very much. We need to stop allowing the conversation to get distracted…

Corporations can steal your work, etc. and thereby cause enormous problems that do not fit governments. For me I think they're a much greater danger than at least my government. My government has no reason to care about what's on my computer. A company however, has an incentive to use every scrap.

Wait until you speak out against your government or try to organize a protest.

More realistically, if you are a women trying to get an abortion in Texas and message someone to help you leave the state to get one see how much more you should be worried.

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/09/texas-abortion-trans...

The government has guns and policemen that can take away your freedom, your property without a trial (civil forfeiture), etc.

Google can serve you ads

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#173
post #144

As a brit I would find it amusing if Apple, Google, Meta and Microsoft jointly announced that privacy is a hill to die on, and they'd rather collectively withdraw their businesses from the UK than accede to demands like this. My government would cave within the hour.

100%. We have very little power to demand this in my opinion. Honestly I don't think Apple would even need to work with other tech giants on this (although that would help). The UK makes up a few percent of Apple's total revenues so while Apple would take a hit, they can afford to pull out of the UK and it could be worth doing if they're serious about proving how important privacy is to them. Apple will face some rep…

You mean, like the rest of the world'd financial institutions do for the US? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Account_Tax_Complian...

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People have been arrested for perfectly legal anti-royalist propaganda, and threatened with arrest for such things as protesting by holding a blank sheet of paper, so I don't agree.

Citation needed

Several examples, including blank piece of paper: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62883713

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#175
post #98
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's the BBC report on the matter: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20g288yldko It applies to content stored using ADP, Apple's E2EE tech. A backdoor into that would mean applying a backdoor into iOS on the phone itself, which is a much larger attack surface than anything centralised. All of which highlights the clownish nature of these regulations. They are so easy for bad actors to circumvent (eg using their…

Since it seems to be illegal to even reveal if one of these requests was received, it's also worrying that, by extension, it would be illegal to declare a data breach once the backdoor was inevitably exploited by another bad actor. So, how would anybody know that a foreign government was spying on them? Nothing would stop them installing Pegasus on your phone and exfiltrating even your 'secure' data. The stupid thing…

This is exactly the problem. The logical outcome is so bad that the only risk mitigation is to not use their services at all.

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#176
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this specific case: good. I don’t want USA companies cooperating with UK’s extremist policies like this one.

Companies cannot really stand up to governments. Unless another government gets involved, Apple will have to follow UK law if they want to keep doing business in that country. By the way, the US is not a stranger to that kind of overreach, either (e.g. CLOUD act).

I mean apple could just sell unlocked phones that work in any country, and let people smuggle them in however they want.

Apple just happens to operate their buisness in a way that's very vulnerable to government overreach. Their OS is dependent on centralized, easily firewalled services. They have a lot of brick and mortar stores, and so on.

I believe that corporations can operate paralegally when need be.

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#177
post #144

As a brit I would find it amusing if Apple, Google, Meta and Microsoft jointly announced that privacy is a hill to die on, and they'd rather collectively withdraw their businesses from the UK than accede to demands like this. My government would cave within the hour.

100%. We have very little power to demand this in my opinion. Honestly I don't think Apple would even need to work with other tech giants on this (although that would help). The UK makes up a few percent of Apple's total revenues so while Apple would take a hit, they can afford to pull out of the UK and it could be worth doing if they're serious about proving how important privacy is to them. Apple will face some rep…

Exactly, the UK’s number one priority right now is growth, otherwise we’re headed for austerity and possibly an election victory for Reform/Nigel Farage. I don’t think entering into a standoff with Apple over this is going to do much to give the impression the UK is great for business.

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#178

I keep saying this, and nobody believes me, but I'm just going to keep trying: These things happen because so often we focus the privacy conversation on corporations, which is exactly where the governments want it to be. My controversial but strong opinion is that privacy from corporations matters very little, but privacy from governments matters very much. We need to stop allowing the conversation to get distracted…

We should have privacy from both. In fact I very much dislike the framing of privacy as being from something — my privacy is for me.

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#179
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's easier to not buy an iPhone than it was trying to prevent a politician I didn't trust from getting in office. In either case, collective action is, at best, the best you're going to have. Do regulations not have meaning?

You might think you're safe because you don't carry a phone, never upload a photo, etc. You drove across the country in a car you paid cash for while bemoaning cameras that catch you speeding, in the name of "privacy". Meanwhile meta knows exactly where you are as their face recognition attached it to your shadow profile when someone took a selfie with you in the background, you were seen on a ring doorbell by amazon…

> My government doesn't have a copy of my family tree

They absolutely do, your parents were on your government issued birth certificate, and the government issues marriage certificates and official name change paperwork too. I'd be a bit surprised if they don't some idea of your DNA as well, though I'd agree not to the level of Ancestry.

Re: U.K. demand for a back door to Apple data threatens Americans, lawmakers say

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a government that believes in thought crimes. They will likely arrest people for having illegal memes on their phones or for texting messages to friends of which the government does not approve. If there was prequal to 1984, it would look something like this.

By "thought crimes", would you mean firing people for holding positions responsible for DEI policies which were assigned to them and which there was a legal obligation to enforce? Because that would NEVER happen in the US, certainly no government agency would fire its own people for having following legally enacted government policy just because that policy was no longer in fashion (though still legal government poli…

The people in the UK actually go to prison though
Post reply on HN