Is there really any benefit in these small changes? Certainly a good laugh out of it!
YouTube's New Hue
101–110 of 292 posts
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#102Reminds me of the infamous Pepsi logo redesign: https://www.goldennumber.net/wp-content/uploads/pepsi-arnell...
I forget when this was first leaked, but over the years, this has become my go-to example for premium artisanal marketing bullshit.
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#103An ad interrupted my video today, it was Tom Hanks in a podcast talking about his prostate. The ad was (not so obviously) AI generated; both an AI clone of his voice and an AI-generated face-swap/ lip replacement. This seemed pretty surprising because it was fairly convincing. He looks like he is saying the dialog of the ad. It's surprising because there's no way the creator of the ad got Hanks' approval to use his l…
I know someone who works on the technical side of a national newspaper and he has been happy and encouraged me to continue when I pointed out scammy ads ("Japanese knives" and that sort of things).
Seems they don't vet ads individually but can take down ads they become aware of.
With Google however it seems to me money is all that matters.
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-sequitur aside, what specifically do you want to post on YouTube that's not allowed? To me it seems like you have to go pretty far off the rails before they'll step in.
I'll bite; - When I search for recent news e.g. "australian medical staff jewish" (current topic), all the results are left leaning responses. I would mostly prefer to see the original video without commentary and uncut, and also would like to see more right wing responses. (A lot of issues over the years that were right leaning would just surface late night comedians mocking the right wings perspective on such issue…
For the second example: Mullis is literally insane, and you can still find his opinions on YouTube, as you yourself found. Did you try uploading those lectures you found yourself? I’ll bet money that they won’t be take down (except maybe for copyright).
To be a little less charitable: this is a persecution fantasy. The right wing is not being silenced by YouTube.
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#105I absolutely hate the gradient on the progress bar. When a video is full screened I'm no longer able to tell at a glance how far along the progress bar is because the gradient and the grey segment for buffering all fades together. This is so simple to not mess up. It worked before. Why did you change it??
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#106Re: YouTube's New Hue
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
The least they could do is write up something as unhinged as that old Pepsi design strategy document. https://www.goldennumber.net/wp-content/uploads/pepsi-arnell...
Thats amazing. Its in the uncanny valley where I can't tell if they're serious or if they're having a laugh. It immediately makes me think of the song "Redesign Your Logo" by Lemon Demon. Pure comedy.
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#108Good thing I use Invidious instead.
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#109An ad interrupted my video today, it was Tom Hanks in a podcast talking about his prostate. The ad was (not so obviously) AI generated; both an AI clone of his voice and an AI-generated face-swap/ lip replacement. This seemed pretty surprising because it was fairly convincing. He looks like he is saying the dialog of the ad. It's surprising because there's no way the creator of the ad got Hanks' approval to use his l…
Re: YouTube's New Hue
#110I literally can’t read this blog post because it keeps jumping to the top of the page to play the video again and again. Maybe take 10% of the time you spent dreaming up new colors to just make your blog function like a regular page instead of adding a million weird animations?
Did no one at Google read this blog post on an iPhone before publishing?