Live data from Hacker News

DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

deadbeef.sourceforge.io

101–110 of 155 posts

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#101
post #42
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using strawberry since moving to linux since there was no good foobar2000 replacement but I just discovered fooyin these past couple of days and this is so convincingly close that I can pretend it's just foobar2000. That's not to throw any shade on strawberry, it's also incredibly good, but foobar2000 will always have it's claws in me.

foobar2000 actually runs very well in Wine.

[deleted]

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#102

DeaDBeeF has been my goto for a while now because it's the only linux music player with the extremely specific feature I used in winamp: enqueue is an arbitrary list so you can have a playlist, leave it in order and/but/then play a song multiple times in a row. everyone else it's a toggle so you enqueue a song and then enqueue again and it removes it; if you want to listen to a song multiple times before moving on yo…

>music player with the extremely specific feature I used in winamp

If you have any windows boxes around, WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a recent-build of winamp without the bullshit. And includes the Enqueue feature.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#103

Other fun music players: - https://foobar2000.org - https://volumio.org - http://rhythmbox.org - https://amarok.kde.org - https://cmus.github.io - https://museeks.io - https://fooyin.org - https://audacious-media-player.org - https://www.clementine-player.org

But none of those whips the llama's ass.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I must be an even older geezer, as I detest all the late wave music players that became full screen things that load music from everywhere. I organize my mp3s into folders by genre, then named by artist - title. To play one I double click it from the system file browser, and just want a tiny, og winamp style player to open and play that one song. Or multi select for an instant playlist.

I do the same thing, and players (mostly on Android) that only support metadata-based browsing annoy me to no end. Like, just give a file browser so I can load a directory, for god's sake! It's much, much less effort than implementing a media library!

> Like, just give a file browser so I can load a directory, for god's sake! It's much, much less effort than implementing a media library!

I see you don't know the challenges of disk access on Android for developers.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#105

Other fun music players: - https://foobar2000.org - https://volumio.org - http://rhythmbox.org - https://amarok.kde.org - https://cmus.github.io - https://museeks.io - https://fooyin.org - https://audacious-media-player.org - https://www.clementine-player.org

I'm rather fond of QMMP, because being built with normal Qt5 and a very vanilla stock theme, it integrates nicely into my "You're going to look like Motif come hell or high water" desktop theming philosophy.

I also find that I never got into playlists, so something that can easily be coaxed to just swallow 100Gb of content and let me occasionally search for a specific track is my speed.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I must be an even older geezer, as I detest all the late wave music players that became full screen things that load music from everywhere. I organize my mp3s into folders by genre, then named by artist - title. To play one I double click it from the system file browser, and just want a tiny, og winamp style player to open and play that one song. Or multi select for an instant playlist.

I do the same thing, and players (mostly on Android) that only support metadata-based browsing annoy me to no end. Like, just give a file browser so I can load a directory, for god's sake! It's much, much less effort than implementing a media library!

I've been using Music Folder Player (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.zorillasoft...) for over a decade for this very reason.

I think Android has now made this type of player almost obsolete. Every app has its own file sandbox and apps must go through an abstraction for media that works poorly.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#107
post #73
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://strawberrymusicplayer.org/

It's the successor of Clementine.

ah mate, thanks. i was wondering why i couldn't download the windows build of clementine, seems like they're infra is not updated or something else.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#108

DeaDBeeF has been my goto for a while now because it's the only linux music player with the extremely specific feature I used in winamp: enqueue is an arbitrary list so you can have a playlist, leave it in order and/but/then play a song multiple times in a row. everyone else it's a toggle so you enqueue a song and then enqueue again and it removes it; if you want to listen to a song multiple times before moving on yo…

cmus does this as well.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#109
post #2

Some people I know love it but it just doesn't work for me in the way I use a music player. It's similar to foobar2000 in some ways which depending on your preferences can be good or bad. And the name is terrible. Strawberry is better for me but still kind of janky. Quod Libet and Rythmbox would seem closer to my ideal interface-wise, but scored massive own goals they seemingly will never recover from. How in 2025 mu…

> How in 2025 music players refuse to (not can't, refuse to) get "Album Artist" right blows my mind.

And many of the few that get "Album Artist" won't respect tags that set the sort order for it either. If you are lucky, they will at least special case "The" so that "The Beatles" are under B, but they'll still put John Denver under "J".

The only one I know of that gets both of these right is cmus; I don't choose to use a terminal-based music player, I'm forced to.

Re: DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a large and growing number of music players for streaming from your own server. You get the best of both worlds by owning your music and having it accessible anywhere.

They are all so poorly written though. None of the OSS media players come even remotely close to the UX of Spotify, and that's speaking as someone who has paid way too much for Roon because it's at least 80% of the way there.

Evermusic https://apps.apple.com/us/app/evermusic-cloud-music-player/i... is pretty solid.
Post reply on HN