Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
1–10 of 86 posts
Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#2Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#3I hate to push blockchain stuff, but something like IPFS might actually be a good idea here.
Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#4Permanent, until they go out of business. We should just standardize on archive.org and figure out a way to distribute redundant copies of its data around in such a way that it can survive even if the original Internet Archive goes down. I hate to push blockchain stuff, but something like IPFS might actually be a good idea here.
Having said that, there are a variety of different archives that Wikipedia uses for backups - Perma.cc is included on that list. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_web_archiv...
There's also projects like Archive Box that allows for self hosted backups of websites https://archivebox.io/
Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#5Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#6Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#7Permanent, until they go out of business. We should just standardize on archive.org and figure out a way to distribute redundant copies of its data around in such a way that it can survive even if the original Internet Archive goes down. I hate to push blockchain stuff, but something like IPFS might actually be a good idea here.
Like any service, it might shut down due to lack of interest, but I doubt Harvard Law is at risk of “going out of business”.
Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#8did they not understand that at all? did they just not do any work on it? or did they understand it and do great work but just fail to but it in 100pt text as item 0 on the list? who knows.
Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#9Re: Perma.cc – Permanent Link Service
#1095% of the work for a useful product like this is figuring out how to ensure it survives your dumb business model or the idiocy of the tech industry, and yet none of the words on this landing page explain what work they've done on that. did they not understand that at all? did they just not do any work on it? or did they understand it and do great work but just fail to but it in 100pt text as item 0 on the list? who…
Being literal librarians, I am fairly sure the creators of this service have thought through how it will remain accessible in the long term.