51–60 of 107 posts
Business opportunity to launch an LLM that specifically targets pr0n site developers.
If I used copilot, it would prevent the doctors from recording the patient's sex?
I wonder if one can sneak in words into code to avoid public code to be used for training AI. Perhaps just a tiny little nazi reference.
I have a simple question. If censorship is considered evil regarding the written word and communications between humans, why do we want to then censor LLMs differently? It is either counterintuitive or simply a false concept we should abandon. Perhaps it is more about training, similar to how children are 'monsters' and need to be socialized/tamed.
It's somewhat similar to the laws some places have against providing free alcohol. Alcohol is still legal and abuse still happens. However, at least requiring people to spend money provides some friction to prevent things from escalating too much.
I have a simple question. If censorship is considered evil regarding the written word and communications between humans, why do we want to then censor LLMs differently? It is either counterintuitive or simply a false concept we should abandon. Perhaps it is more about training, similar to how children are 'monsters' and need to be socialized/tamed.
There are a lot of things I can say as a citizen that would get me fired from my job, or at least a talking-to by someone in management.
At the moment at least these LLMs are mainly hosted services branded by the companies that trained and/or operate them. Having a Microsoft-branded LLM say something that Microsoft as a corporation doesn't want said is something they will try to control.
That's also different from thinking that all LLMs should be censored. You can train or run your own with different priorities if you wish. It's like how there's a lot of media out there that you can consume or create yourself perfectly legally that isn't sold at Walmart.
I have a simple question. If censorship is considered evil regarding the written word and communications between humans, why do we want to then censor LLMs differently? It is either counterintuitive or simply a false concept we should abandon. Perhaps it is more about training, similar to how children are 'monsters' and need to be socialized/tamed.
Simple: the people who are very pro free speech (i.e. "censorship is evil"), and the people who want to censor LLMs are distinct groups (though both groups are vocal).
I have a simple question. If censorship is considered evil regarding the written word and communications between humans, why do we want to then censor LLMs differently? It is either counterintuitive or simply a false concept we should abandon. Perhaps it is more about training, similar to how children are 'monsters' and need to be socialized/tamed.
I’m somewhat “rude” in my code comments and was tripped up by this last month… took me a while to figure out while on that specific file autocomplete would stop working https://bsky.app/profile/giorgio.azzinna.ro/post/3lecq3v5gts... Not to mention, there’s apparently some research saying code with swear words has higher quality, so if AI causes some decline there, we now know why it is https://www.reddit.com/r/progra…