It should be like ads.
Required a watermark that is NIST standardized
edit: sorry I though y’all would get the joke
California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
11–20 of 186 posts
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#12I wish this legislation would also apply to AI generated emails, sales outreach, and LinkedIn messages.
[deleted]
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#13Should PUBG mobile players be told they are winning against bots? Should psychics tell you they cannot really speak for the dead?
> Should psychics tell you they cannot really speak for the dead?
Yes?
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#14I wish this legislation would also apply to AI generated emails, sales outreach, and LinkedIn messages.
Also, political SMS messages and the messages you get from some other random number acknowledging the "STOP" message you just sent. (Especially if it were in a machine readable form.)
For political stuff you need a human to press send. So it's a semi automated system.
I've volunteered before, and at least in CA, you basically have a gui that prepolutes messages and guides you through each number one by one.
Its really weird
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#15Seems to be down.
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#16Should PUBG mobile players be told they are winning against bots? Should psychics tell you they cannot really speak for the dead?
Yes and yes
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#17Interesting. I’m afraid this won’t really go anywhere, but it’s a good conversation to have
On one hand, judging by the comments, there’s quite a bit of interest on disclosure
On the other hand, corporations and big advertisers (spammers?) might not really want it. Or is there a positive aspect in disclosure for them?
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#18Nah dude * hits bongs, coughs * if you ask if they're a bot they _have_ to say yes
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#19The requirement doesn't kick in until 10 million monthly US users. I don't see why this shouldn't apply to smaller businesses.
[deleted]
Re: California bill would require bots to disclose that they are bots
#20How do I know if I'm a bot?