Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 554 posts

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#72
As a website owner and VPN user I see both sides of this.

On one hand, I get the annoying "Verify" box every time I use ChatGPT (and now due its popularity, DeepSeek as well).

On the other hand, without Cloudflare I'd be seeing thousands of junk requests and hacking attempts everyday, people attempting credit card fraud, etc.

I honestly don't know what the solution is.

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#73
post #5

I'm using chrome on linux and noticed that this year cloudflare is very agressive in showing the "Verify you are a human" box. Now a lot of sites that use cloudflare show it and once you solve the challenge it shows it again after 30 minutes! What are you protecting cloudflare? Also they show those captchas when going to robots.txt... unbelievable.

I run a honeypot and I can say with reasonable confidence many (most?) bots and scrapers use a Chrome on Linux user-agent. It's a fairly good indication of malicious traffic. In fact I would say it probably outweighs legitimate traffic with that user agent. It's also a pretty safe assumption that Cloudflare is not run by morons, and they have access to more data than we do, by virtue of being the strip club bouncer f…

Sure, but does that means that we, Linux users, can't go on the web anymore ? It's way easier for spammers and bots to move to another user agent/system than for legitimate users. So whatever causes this is not a great solution to this problem. You can do better CF

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#74
post #43
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Small/medium SaaS. Had ~8 hours of 100k reqs/sec last year when we usually see 100-150 reqs/sec. Moved everything behind a Cloudflare Enterprise setup and ditched AWS Client Access VPN (OpenVPN) for Cloudflare WARP I've only been here 1.5 years but sounds like we usually see 1 decent sized DDoS a year plus a handful of other "DoS" usually AI crawler extensions or 3rd parties calling too aggressively There are some ex…

Did you put rate limiting rules on your webserver? Why was that not enough to mitigate the DDoS?

That might have been good for preventing someone from spamming your HotScripts guestbook in 2005, but not much else.

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#75
post #31

How many of you all are running bare metal hooked right up to the internet? Is DDoS or any of that actually a super common problem? I know it happens, but also I've run plenty of servers hooked directly to the internet (with standard *nix security precautions and hosting provider DDoS protection) and haven't had it actually be an issue. So why run absolutely everything through Cloudflare?

> How many of you all are running bare metal hooked right up to the internet? I do. Many people I know do. In my risk model, DDoS is something purely theoretical. Yes it can happen, but you have to seriously upset someone for it to maybe happen.

From my experience, if you tick off the wrong person, the threshold for them starting a DDoS is surprisingly low.

A while ago, my company was hiring and conducting interviews, and after one candidate was rejected, one of our sites got hit by a DDoS. I wasn't in the room when people were dealing with it, but in the post-incident review, they said "we're 99% sure we know exactly who this came from".

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#76
post #55
post #5

I'm using chrome on linux and noticed that this year cloudflare is very agressive in showing the "Verify you are a human" box. Now a lot of sites that use cloudflare show it and once you solve the challenge it shows it again after 30 minutes! What are you protecting cloudflare? Also they show those captchas when going to robots.txt... unbelievable.

Cloudflare has been even worse for me on Linux + Firefox. On a number of sites I get the "Verify" challenge and after solving it immediately get a message saying "You have been blocked" every time. Clearing cookies, disabling UBO, and other changes make no difference. Reporting the issue to them does nothing. This hostility to normal browsing behavior makes me extremely reluctant to ever use Cloudflare on any project…

Yeah, same here. I've avoided it for a most of my customers for that very reason already

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#77

How many of you all are running bare metal hooked right up to the internet? Is DDoS or any of that actually a super common problem? I know it happens, but also I've run plenty of servers hooked directly to the internet (with standard *nix security precautions and hosting provider DDoS protection) and haven't had it actually be an issue. So why run absolutely everything through Cloudflare?

DDoS is a problem, but for most ordinary problems it's not as bad as people make it out to be. Even something very simple like fail2ban will go a long way.

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#78
post #48

How many of you all are running bare metal hooked right up to the internet? Is DDoS or any of that actually a super common problem? I know it happens, but also I've run plenty of servers hooked directly to the internet (with standard *nix security precautions and hosting provider DDoS protection) and haven't had it actually be an issue. So why run absolutely everything through Cloudflare?

Most (D)DOS attacks are just either UDP floods or SYN floods that iptables will handle without any problem. Sometimes what people think are DDOS is just their application DDOSing themself because they are doing recursive calls to some back-end micro-service. If it was actually a traffic based DDOS someone still needs to pay for that bandwidth which would be too expansive for most companies anyway - even if it kept yo…

You need an answer to someone buying $10 of booter time and sending a volumetric attack your way. If any of the traffic is even reaching your server, you've already lost, so iptables isn't going to help you because your link is saturated.

Cloudflare offers protection for free.

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#79

How many of you all are running bare metal hooked right up to the internet? Is DDoS or any of that actually a super common problem? I know it happens, but also I've run plenty of servers hooked directly to the internet (with standard *nix security precautions and hosting provider DDoS protection) and haven't had it actually be an issue. So why run absolutely everything through Cloudflare?

It’s free unless you’re rolling in traffic, it’s extremely easy to setup, and CF can handle pretty much all of your infra with tools way better than AWS. Also you can buy a cheaper ipv6 only VPS and run it thru free CF proxy to allow ipv4 traffic to your site

Easy to set up, easy to screw up user experience. Easy-peasy.

Re: Tell HN: Cloudflare is blocking Pale Moon and other non-mainstream browsers

#80
post #7
post #5

I'm using chrome on linux and noticed that this year cloudflare is very agressive in showing the "Verify you are a human" box. Now a lot of sites that use cloudflare show it and once you solve the challenge it shows it again after 30 minutes! What are you protecting cloudflare? Also they show those captchas when going to robots.txt... unbelievable.

The captcha on robots is a misconfiguration in the website. CF has lots of issues, but this one is on their costumer. Also they detect Google and other bots, so those may be going through anyway.

Sure; but sensible defaults ought to be in place. There are certain "well known" urls that are intended for machine consuption. CF should permit (and perhaps rate limit?) those by default, unless the user overrides them.
Post reply on HN