Live data from Hacker News

Words flagged in search of current NSF awards

mastodon.social

31–40 of 201 posts

Re: Words flagged in search of current NSF awards

#32
post #3

thus begins the end of pax americana; you can't have a space-age economy if you don't have science.

[flagged]

hi my partner is a neuroscientist and multiple words on this list appear on any one of her proposals. She doesn't even work with humans.

If you think this only affects social sciences you don't have the requisite knowledge to have an opinion here.

Re: Words flagged in search of current NSF awards

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that relates to talking about history in a way that may make white people feel bad about it: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/01/florida-sb-148-racis...

Are you trying to justify or explain?

I don't support this action by Trump and I am linking to an article that criticizes the Florida bill. But it is trying to explain/justify why this word may be banned based referencing the ideological background that is motivating it.

Re: Words flagged in search of current NSF awards

#34
post #5

RIP statisticians and Ml researchers who use the word “bias” in their work.

In 2055, anti-wokeists will have banned "bias," and wokeists will have banned "weight." Following defeat in the pan-Eastern bent ground war, hawks will ban "loss." They will be renamed plusses, and double plusses, and ungood.

good. /s

Re: Words flagged in search of current NSF awards

#36
post #14

In particle physics we usually use these terms which will be at any proposal. This is an interesting textbook definition of false positives when you have list that is using too common words. - Minimum "Biased" data - "Discrimination" or "Discriminatory" variables - Phase space "excluded" - "Inclusion" of data/variable/anything - "inequality" -> wow bell's inequality and all this theory work about inequalities will be…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN