Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is fairly easily answered through legislation like the GDPR which classes this data as personal data if it’s associated with an identified or identifiable person.
A legislative body writing something down doesn’t mean society has agreed to it. If someone journals and writes down everyone they met with locations and dates, they will laugh you out of the room if you tell them they are violating GDPR. This also leads to stupid shit like people not being sure if they can point a camera at their driveway to catch vehicle break-ins. Finally, classifying something as “personal data”…
Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
311–320 of 628 posts
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#312Earlier quoted context omitted.
People will share their whole list because it’s simpler
Or because they were tricked. eg. LinkedIn’s “Connect with your contacts” onboarding step which sounds like it’ll check your contacts against existing LinkedIn users but actually spam invites anyone on your contact list that doesn’t have an account.
I also see the shenanigans of adding new 'privacy' settings and setting them open by default. Another typical Microsoft ploy by the way.
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#313Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is possible to just not use a phone number. I mostly connect through Signal. I do technically have a phone number that my close friends and family have, but its a random VoIP number that I usually change every year or so. Surprisingly no one has really cared, I send out a text that I got a new number and that's that.
How? Most of the services I use, from Walgreens to banks to retirement accounts, require a phone number either for 2FA or just to verify that you’re you when signing up. After changing my phone number this year and having to go through the rigamarole for each service, I decided never again.
I can kind of see why not allowing 2FA to a number that could be easier to loose, but that's weak argument. Of course they don't want someone from .ru to get a US number with all of the baggage that would entail
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's not properly appreciated that Apple fully endorses all of this. For two reasons: (1) the provision of the output of billions of dollars of developer time to their users for no up front cost (made back via ads) is super valuable to their platform; and (2) they uniquely could stop this (at the price of devastating their app store), but choose not to. In light of that, perhaps reevaluate their ATT efforts a…
>I think it's not properly appreciated that Apple fully endorses all of this. [...] they uniquely could stop this (at the price of devastating their app store), but choose not to. A perfectly privacy respecting app store isn't going to do any good if it doesn't have any apps. Just look at f-droid. Most (all?) of the apps there might be privacy respecting, but good luck getting any of the popular apps (eg. facebook, t…
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about a no/limited internet setting? So many apps spy on you and they don’t need network at all to function.
Until the app's devs get wise to this, and do not allow the app to function without the network access. It could be as simple as a full screen, non-closable screen that says the app requires network access with a button to the proper setting to correct the issue.
I'm always wondering why these idiots force the creation of an account with their direct competitor. It's the only app I have that does this. But anyway I don't use their app for that reason, only use them a bit through API.
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#317Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#318Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's not properly appreciated that Apple fully endorses all of this. For two reasons: (1) the provision of the output of billions of dollars of developer time to their users for no up front cost (made back via ads) is super valuable to their platform; and (2) they uniquely could stop this (at the price of devastating their app store), but choose not to. In light of that, perhaps reevaluate their ATT efforts a…
>I think it's not properly appreciated that Apple fully endorses all of this. [...] they uniquely could stop this (at the price of devastating their app store), but choose not to. A perfectly privacy respecting app store isn't going to do any good if it doesn't have any apps. Just look at f-droid. Most (all?) of the apps there might be privacy respecting, but good luck getting any of the popular apps (eg. facebook, t…
40 years ago apps were sold on floppy disks. 30 years ago they were sold on CD-ROMs. 20 years ago, DVDs.
Online-only apps are a recent thing. A privacy respecting app store certainly can be a thing. Apps being blocked or banned from stores for choosing to not respect your privacy is a good thing.
Re: Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads
#320Because wow that would be simple to spoof and chaff and spam.
It's dinnertime here but if I had a few minutes I could make (my own house) appear indistinguishable from (Chase Center) from the perspective of SSID landscape.
It would cost nothing and is trivially easy. Even if they pair MAC addresses that's not a big hurdle. I'll bet relative signal strengths are not measured.
It might be a good flushing action[1].