31–40 of 445 posts
I'm not sure if this is worth a subscription. DSPy and DeepseekR1 can already move this direction, if I understand right.
Say whatever you want about openAI, they are shipping more than any other company on the planet.
Different pre-cooked prompts and filters don’t really amount to new products either, despite them being marketed as such. It’s like adobe treating each tool in photoshop as its own product.
I feel that a lot of this can already be achieved via aider (not affiliated), and any of the top models.
Look, who's copying who now. They added _the_ button!
I’m not sure I understand what you mean by “the button”. If you’re comparing this to DeepSeek’s copying, it’s not really the same thing right? DeepSeek essentially stole intellectual property by violating OpenAI’s terms of service. As I understand it, this is a copy of Google’s Deep Research
Meanwhile, their entire training corpus was the result of scraping the intellectual property and copyrighted materials of THE ENTIRE PUBLIC INTERNET.
Woe is them to be sure.
Is this "deep research" tool exploiting open knowledge creators, using their work without compensation?
Are you exploiting open knowledge creators, using their work without compensation?
Say whatever you want about openAI, they are shipping more than any other company on the planet.
Say whatever you want about openAI, they are shipping more than any other company on the planet.
What does that even mean? Treating each iterative model as a new product is not any different than Google changing its search or youtube recommendation algorithm. Different pre-cooked prompts and filters don’t really amount to new products either, despite them being marketed as such. It’s like adobe treating each tool in photoshop as its own product.
I'm not sure if this is worth a subscription. DSPy and DeepseekR1 can already move this direction, if I understand right.