Curious libjpegturbo fork by an author who hates CMake?
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: Curious libjpegturbo fork by an author who hates CMake?
#2I don't quite get the rationale but ok.
Re: Curious libjpegturbo fork by an author who hates CMake?
#3>By tracking the latest stable and selectively integrating changes we've been able to build libjpegturbo easily on a handful of unsupported architecture/compiler combos of the main.
>
>We do not hate Cmake or think it's worse, just autoconf is mature and capable and 99% of the time works perfectly fine. We will maintain it as needed.
/shrug. Doesn't look like a hard fork and it's good for the folks that need it.
I don't know what issues there are with CMake and older compilers, but I trust that they are real enough to warrant this effort.