Sounds cool. But where are all the books? No Hemingway, Vonnegut, Faulkner, Kerouac, Fitzgerald. Why no classics?
Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
71–80 of 92 posts
Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#72So I tried some current best seller type stuff. No Stephenie Meyer, no Suzanne Collins, no Charlaine Harris. Finally found some Stieg Larsson.
The blue headlines and grey text are hard to read. The little cloud thingie seems odd. Other than that, I like the site. I clicked on links, got the review, from the original site. More content and I'd probably be a user.
Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#73Can you make the slider (move me) and the category names (bestsellers, recent-in-fiction etc..) a fixed/floating bar on the page? As I scroll below / load more to view more books, I sometimes forget what category I am looking at and if I need to switch to another one.
Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#74A couple of suggestions based on my quick test of the site:
- Have the author's name next to the book title (possibly clickable to get a list of other books by the author)
- Please separate Sci-Fi and Fantasy! They're completely different genres that too often get grouped together. Presumably because the fan base seems to cross over quite a bit.
Anyway, Good luck and I hope the site is a success!
Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#75Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#76Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#77The clouds on this website aren't bad, but I didn't even realize they were there for a few minutes while I looked over the book covers. They blended into the background and didn't instantly provide a positive or negative connotation.
Since the site's name is 'I Dream Books', perhaps a nice fluffy pillow represents a good book. Or a dream bubble with a happy face. Perhaps the badly reviewed books get a dream bubble that's bursting, or has a nightmare inside.
Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#78Re: Show HN: A RottenTomatoes for Books
#79Maybe even more so than for movies readers tend have more in common with some critics then others and the 'meta' opinion is just not that interesting.