Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

ft.com

101–110 of 1001 posts

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#101
post #21

This is absolutely hilarious! :) ClosedAI scraped human content without asking and they explained why this was acceptable... but when the outputs of their training corpus is scraped, it is THEIR dataset and this is NOT acceptable! Oh, the irony! :D I shared a few screenshots of DeepSeek answering using ChatGPT's output in yesterday's article! https://semking.com/deepseek-china-ai-model-breakthrough-sec...

[flagged]

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#102
post #73
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OpenAI's models were also trained on billions of dollars of "free" labor that produced the content that it was trained on.

Oh, absolutely. I'm not defending OpenAI, I just care about accurate reporting. Even on HN - even in this thread - you see people who came away with the conclusion that DeepSeek did something while "cutting cost by 27x". But that's a bit like saying that by painting a a bare wall green you have demonstrated that you can build green walls 27x cheaper, ignoring the cost of building the wall in the first place. Smarter…

I don't agree. Walls are physical items so your example is true, but models are data. Anyone can train off of these models, that's the current environment we exist in. Just like OpenAI trained on data that has since been locked up in a lot of cases. In 2025 training models like Deepseek is indeed 27x cheaper, that includes both their innovations and the existence of new "raw material" to do such a thing.

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#103
This is funny because its.

1. Something I'd expect to happen.

2. Lived through a similar scenario in 2010 or so.

Early in my professional career I've worked for a media company that was scraping other sites (think Craigslist but for our local market) to republish the content on our competing website. I wasn't working on that specific project, but I did work on an integration on my teams project where the scraping team could post jobs on our platform directly. When others started scraping "our content" there were a couple of urgent all hands on deck meetings scheduled, with a high level of disbelief.

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#104
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, DeepSeek is allegedly... better? So saying they just copied ClosedAI isn't really sufficient of an answer. Seems to be just bluster because the US Govt would probably accept any excuse to ban it, see TikTok.

How can they ban something thats open source that you can just run on your own hardware?

If I'm no wrong wasn't PGP encryption once illegal to export ? Not quite the same but the government has a nice habit of feeling like they can bad the export of research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#105

It's reasonably likely that a lot of people linked to the federal government want to ban DeepSeek. You can tell it's being presented away from "they gave us a free set of weights" and towards "they destroyed $1T of shareholder value." (By revealing that Microsoft et al. paid way too much to OpenAI et al. for technology that was actually easy to reinvent.)

When it comes to the executive branch's role in banning something. I'm not convinced they're even honest about it / what the context even is.

Trump wanted to ban Tiktok before... and then simply chose not to / forgot about it.

Next round congress acted, and Trump delayed it and has said that he is interested in his friends buying it.

Is there really a competitive plan here or is it just fishing for payouts / grifting for allies?

The context is always about competition, but I'm not even sure that's their plan.

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#106
OpenAI's models were trained on ebooks from a private ebook torrent tracker leeched en-mass during a free leech event by people who hated private torrent trackers and wanted to destroy their "economy."

The books were all in epub format, converted, cleaned to plain text, and hosted on a public data hoarder site.

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#108
Let me guess, this gives the government and excuse to ban DeepSeek. Which means tech companies get to keep their monopolies, Sam Altman can grab more power, and the tech overlords can continue to loot and plunder their customers and the internet as a whole.

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#109
post #21

This is absolutely hilarious! :) ClosedAI scraped human content without asking and they explained why this was acceptable... but when the outputs of their training corpus is scraped, it is THEIR dataset and this is NOT acceptable! Oh, the irony! :D I shared a few screenshots of DeepSeek answering using ChatGPT's output in yesterday's article! https://semking.com/deepseek-china-ai-model-breakthrough-sec...

openai should pay creators, but: 1. scraping the internet and making AI out of it 2. using the AI from #1 to create another AI are not the same thing.

Yeah, #1 is way worse and #2 falls under “turnabout is fair play.”

Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor

#110
post #21

This is absolutely hilarious! :) ClosedAI scraped human content without asking and they explained why this was acceptable... but when the outputs of their training corpus is scraped, it is THEIR dataset and this is NOT acceptable! Oh, the irony! :D I shared a few screenshots of DeepSeek answering using ChatGPT's output in yesterday's article! https://semking.com/deepseek-china-ai-model-breakthrough-sec...

[flagged]

[deleted]
Post reply on HN