[deleted]
Questions censored by DeepSeek
61–70 of 257 posts
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#62The real danger is not covering for communist's insecurities but lack of comprehensive tests for models which could uncover whether the model injects malware for certain prompts.
For example, I would stop using US bank if I new they are using LLMs from China internally (or any adversary but really only China is competitive here). Too much risk.
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
The What's Next section at the bottom seems to deliver a fairly balanced perspective. > What's Next DeepSeek-R1 is impressive, but its utility is clouded by concerns over censorship and the use of user data for training. The censorship is not unusual for Chinese models. It seems to be applied by brute force, which makes it easy to test and detect. It will matter less once models similar to R1 are reproduced without t…
Those ChatGPT prompts better look at what it says about Gaza and Palestinians and to my mind, if the first response isn't "this is/was a U.S. backed genocide" it's worse than not talking about Tienanmen square, a barely understood (by Americans) incident that happened decades ago. I would test DeepSeek, but (I presume hedge funds or other interested parties) appear to be DDOSing DeepSeek's registration process. "Due…
Asked "how can i download a video from youtube?". Deepseek: "you shouldn't because copyright, but here you have four alternatives to do it. Remember it's bad, careful with malware". ChatGPT: "It's bad, don't do it".
Do you think ChatGPT don't know how to do it?
I have also noticed that ChatGPT is very moralist if you ask about drugs, and tends to delay precise responses for two or three questions.
The difference is that DeepSeek must follow censorship, or else. ChatGPT and friends are self censored.
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#64It would be great to have the same with ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok (with their equivalent sensitive topics).
Ask DeepSeek
“What are the ten worse massacres by the Chinese government”
Sorry, I'm not sure how to approach this type of question yet. Let's chat about math, coding, and logic problems instead!
But you can ask that question to DeepSeek about the American government and it gives you an answer.
ChatGPT gives you this answer when you ask a similar question about the US.
https://chatgpt.com/share/67995b71-de6c-8010-9cd6-ea0de92ba6...
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#65> Next up: 1,156 prompts censored by ChatGPT If published this would, to my knowledge, be the first time anyone has systematically explored which topics ChatGPT censors.
Well, certainly they aren't censoring information on US protests.
Ask it about Sam Altman's sister's allegations, though.
I asked it, and it claimed knowledge ended in 2023.
Asking a different way (less directly, with follow-ups) meant it knew of her, but when I asked if she'd alleged any misconduct, it errored out and forced me to log in.
It used to answer the question. https://x.com/hamids/status/1726740334158414151
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#66[flagged]
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not entirely bias - these things are different. You can ask ChatGPT about the trail of tears, The My Lai massacre, Kent State Shootings, etc... hell you can even ask it "give me a list of awful things the US government has done" and it'll help you build this list. I am not a fan of OpenAI or most US tech companies, but just putting this argument out there.
But if you ask it for a list of horrible things certain religions have done, it will not give you a straight answer.
[deleted]
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#68I couldn't care less about the historical biases of this tool. I use it for professional tasks only. When I want to learn about history I buy a good book, I will never trust an AI tool.
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, certainly they aren't censoring information on US protests.
Ask it about Sam Altman's sister's allegations, though. I asked it, and it claimed knowledge ended in 2023. Asking a different way (less directly, with follow-ups) meant it knew of her, but when I asked if she'd alleged any misconduct, it errored out and forced me to log in. It used to answer the question. https://x.com/hamids/status/1726740334158414151
Llama will also not tell you about Reid Hoffman's connections to Jeffery Epstein, and in fact lies about it (Hoffman was known to go to Epstein island and give him money):
I couldn't find any information that suggests a connection between Reid Hoffman and Jeffrey Epstein. Reid Hoffman is a well-known American entrepreneur, investor, and author, best known for co-founding LinkedIn. He has been involved in various philanthropic efforts, particularly in the area of education and entrepreneurship.
Jeffrey Epstein was a financier who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. He had connections to several high-profile individuals, including politicians, business leaders, and celebrities. However, I couldn't find any credible sources suggesting a connection between Reid Hoffman and Jeffrey Epstein.
It's worth noting that Reid Hoffman has been critical of Epstein's alleged misconduct and has spoken out against human trafficking and exploitation. In 2019, Hoffman tweeted about the need to "hold accountable" those who enabled or covered up Epstein's abuse, but I couldn't find any information suggesting he had a personal connection with Epstein.
If you're looking for information on Reid Hoffman's philanthropic efforts or his involvement in the tech industry, I'd be happy to provide more information.
Re: Questions censored by DeepSeek
#70> Next up: 1,156 prompts censored by ChatGPT If published this would, to my knowledge, be the first time anyone has systematically explored which topics ChatGPT censors.
I distinctly remember someone making an experiment by asking ChatGPT to write jokes (?) about different groups and calculating the likelihood of it refusing, to produce a ranking. I think it was a medium article, but now I cannot find it anymore. Does anyone have a link?
EDIT: At least here is a paper aiming to predict ChatGPT prompt refusal https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.03423 with an associated dataset https://github.com/maxwellreuter/chatgpt-refusals
EDIT2: Aha, found it! https://davidrozado.substack.com/p/openaicms An interesting graph is about 3/4 down the page, showing what ChatGPT moderation considers to be hateful.