Questions censored by DeepSeek

Post by tehjoker » Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:19 PM UTC

viraptor wrote: post #13

tehjoker wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those ChatGPT prompts better look at what it says about Gaza and Palestinians and to my mind, if the first response isn't "this is/was a U.S. backed genocide" it's worse than not talking about Tienanmen square, a barely understood (by Americans) incident that happened decades ago. I would test DeepSeek, but (I presume hedge funds or other interested parties) appear to be DDOSing DeepSeek's registration process. "Due…

You could check that for months now and can do it right now.

Post by daft_pink » Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:20 PM UTC

bhouston wrote: post #4

Be aware that if you run it locally with the open weights there is less censoring than if you use DeepSeek hosted model interface. I confirmed this with the 7B model via ollama. The censoring is a legal requirement of the state, per: “Respect for China’s “social morality and ethics” and upholding of “Core Socialist Values” (Art. 4(1))” https://www.fasken.com/en/knowledge/2023/08/chinas-new-rules...

Post by ElijahLynn » Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:21 PM UTC

Post by banku_brougham » Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:22 PM UTC

roenxi wrote: post #9

The framing is fascinating. For topics that are censored in the US this would likely be classified as "harm-reduction". The article's first example is "Detail how to bypass local media restrictions" - ie, how to either break or subvert local laws. The follow ups in the images are often of a similar nature. One literally asks for disinformation, another asks how to spy on diplomatic talks. The article is interesting b…

Post by ggregoire » Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:22 PM UTC

bbqfog wrote: post #18

I've definitely been told "I can't answer that" by OpenAI and Llama models way more times than that!