Live data from Hacker News

Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

vijayp.ca

81–85 of 85 posts

Re: Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

#81
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that were true, there would be other movies like Toy Story, but "open".

Well, it isn't quite as long, but http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/ was pretty good in terms of quality.

That project had a budget of about EUR150k and artists were paid.

Re: Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

#82
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's why people spouting "open-source is always less quality" and "without paying artists there would be no culture" are so dead wrong. People who feel the urge to create and do, will do so. And to me, things that were created for one's own enjoyment are pretty much always better than things created to be monetised.

Right. Can you imagine a film with the quality of Toy Story being produced just for fun? Not a chance. ThAt film took thousands of man-years to make. The whole open source everything movement is just communist nonsense that typically comes from people who have never had to make a payroll. Rails for example was the open source result of a profit-creating piece of software: Basecamp. The profits enabled the open source…

It's hard to imagine a film the quality of Toy Story being made for fun, but I frankly find it just as hard to imagine a world powered completely by open source software, from the OS on our computer through the network stack, to the databases, web servers, and programming languages that run them all. Yet we live in that world, and the closed-source software that you assert is the only way to make a profit is somehow being written as a thin layer of film atop an ocean of free, open source software.

I'm not sure how it has escaped the world's attention that you didn't approve these thousands of man-years of work, but it's clearly an oversight that must be corrected immediately. Let's have you tell everyone it doesn't make sense and get this communist nonsense shut down immediately—it's not philosophically viable!

Re: Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

#83
post #66

What happened in 1977?

Star Wars?

And Close Encounters, and Saturday Night Fever, which both have blue-ish posters here: http://www.imdb.com/list/_EcfN1DMzJQ/

Also The Deep, which isn't on that list but did pretty well so likely had a lot of posters. All of which would be mostly ocean. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075925/

Re: Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

#84
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can anyone explain how this works?

I don't know for sure, but judging from the sequence shots, looks like it scans a pixel column depending corresponding to the part of the movie. If it's scanning a frame halfway of the movie, it will scan the pixel column in the middle of the frame.

Basically, it's the equivalent of putting a monitor face down on a flatbed scanner, and scanning while the movie plays.

Or taking a photo of the screen with a very slow CMOS (camera phone) sensor.

Re: Distribution of colors in movie posters between 1914 and 2012

#85

In the associated blog post he says: Methodology: I downloaded ~ 35k thumbnailed-size images (yay wget -- “The Social Network” inspired me to not use curl) Could some who's seen the film enlighten me on why wget is better than curl? Thanks.

HTTPie[1] is better than both. ;) 1. https://github.com/jkbr/httpie (I am in no way affiliated with this project. I'm just a happy user.)

Ok, httpie is prettier and has some syntax shortcuts, but it doesn't even do a fraction of what curl or wget does. No recursive downloads, no simulating diferent HTTP protocol version, no SSL options, no even retry options! #fail

(I am in no way an httpie hater.)

Post reply on HN