Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of modern websites even add an intentional delay for buttons to respond or even load because it "looks nice."
Unsure what exactly counts as "looks nice" but I'll often add an intentional delay to buttons whose actions are near instantaneous but not great to do multiple times so that you don't accidentally click it twice.
SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
71–79 of 79 posts
Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is no myth. Go try a Windows 2000 system and compare it to today. Windows 2000 will respond a lot faster (often instant), even on complex applications.
I ran this test myself when another obsolete bit of Y2K kit recently fell into my hands: even with a 256Gb spinning-rust drive and 1Gb of RAM, just using Windows Explorer to copy, move, and delete files took a fraction of the time my main rig did. And my main rig is a Dell T7920 running Win11 Pro for Workstations 24h2, with a Gen4 TLC NVMe directly attached to the Gen3 PCIe bus (at 7,000/6,900Mbps it can totally satu…
Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#73Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#74I am sorry if there is some mistakes here and there about the whole win2000 theme. It was just a weekend project and i always feel those database stuff should be as dusty as old windows..
Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#75I think it's pretty cool that the source code is all in a single file called app.js, and it's just doing simple DOM manipulations, no React, no minification, no libraries. I like to think it's just written like that too, a gigantic file that the author just iterates on.
Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#76Re: SQLook – A free online SQLite database manager with a Windows 2000 interface
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something relatively modern. Wasn't Win2k a failed product?
My point is, I don't know of anything modern that is spelled sufficiently similar to "Windows 2000" for the latter to be a plausible typo of it. Windows 2000 was quite successful, and was the most reliable Windows version so far.