Live data from Hacker News

Every HTML Element

iamwillwang.com

101–110 of 136 posts

Re: Every HTML Element

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Too bad OP is not omniscient and capable of predicting your made up tags I think a more accurate word here would be "prescient". "Omniscient" means knowing everything, but I believe that "everything" doesn't include "everything now and in the future. "Prescient" means knowing future events, i.e. "predicting" (Emphasis mine)

That's obviously up to your definition, but omniscience as commonly understood as an attribute of the Christian God is also knowledge of future events (which is why it's usually argued that it conflicts with free will). "The future" is part of "everything".

I agree with your reasoning (I'm not married to those definitions).

Looking at it again, I would still say that "prescient" would be more accurate, because:

    1. Omniscient is a superset that include prescient"
    2. Prescient is a narrower meaning than omniscient.
IOW, when describing a car, for example

    1. "Automobile" can be used to describe my wife's car
    2. "SUV" is a more accurate description.
So I'll still go with "prescient" being more accurate, in much the same way that "SUV is more accurate.

Re: Every HTML Element

#103
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but in the article I posted: > Popovers created using the Popover API are always non-modal. If you want to create a modal popover, a element is the right way to go. > You can turn a element into a popover ( is perfectly valid) if you want to combine popover control with dialog semantics.

But it's still a non-modal dialog, which doesn't match the JavaScript functionality.

Apologies, for some reason I was convinced you could get a proper modal using the popover api but you're right, it's not a proper modal.

Re: Every HTML Element

#105
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whoa! I'm a big fan of yours. You've really inspired me to think more creatively about the web/software. Thanks a ton, I'm glad this reached you.

After looking at the source for this, I have a tangential question (feel free to answer even if you aren't the OP): Whats the advantage of creating a separate `label` element before/after the input and using `for=` compared to simply wrapping the target input in the label element, like the code snippet below? Your Name? It seems to me that there is a lot less room for error when not using IDs, so I always wrap the in…

Note that the tag does not need and does not use a closing slash and never has in any HTML standard: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/dev/input.html#the-input-elemen...

Re: Every HTML Element

#107
No love for the tag? "The HTML element renders everything following the start tag as raw text, ignoring any following HTML. There is no closing tag, since everything after it is considered raw text." - it's my favorite obscure deprecated HTML tag.

Re: Every HTML Element

#108
post #107

No love for the tag? "The HTML element renders everything following the start tag as raw text, ignoring any following HTML. There is no closing tag, since everything after it is considered raw text." - it's my favorite obscure deprecated HTML tag.

What in the world was the intended use for that?

Re: Every HTML Element

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After looking at the source for this, I have a tangential question (feel free to answer even if you aren't the OP): Whats the advantage of creating a separate `label` element before/after the input and using `for=` compared to simply wrapping the target input in the label element, like the code snippet below? Your Name? It seems to me that there is a lot less room for error when not using IDs, so I always wrap the in…

Note that the tag does not need and does not use a closing slash and never has in any HTML standard: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/dev/input.html#the-input-elemen...

It was required in the XHTML 1.0 specs, people carried it over I don’t know why but everyone stopped validating html so nobody cared.

Re: Every HTML Element

#110
post #107

No love for the tag? "The HTML element renders everything following the start tag as raw text, ignoring any following HTML. There is no closing tag, since everything after it is considered raw text." - it's my favorite obscure deprecated HTML tag.

I'm terrified of opening a paren andforgetting to close it! How terrifying to find a tagged paren that cannot be closed!

"please accept from me this unpretentious bouquet of early-blooming" s

Post reply on HN