Live data from Hacker News

Where is London's most central sheep?

diamondgeezer.blogspot.com

41–50 of 174 posts

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#41

When my wife and I lived in Bristol we developed a metric designed to measure how enjoyable a city was to live in that we called "time to sheep". Basically it's a measure of how long you have to travel from the center of the city before you're in the English countryside surrounded by sheep and the best cities have a low (but not too low) "time to sheep" metric. It helped explain one of the reasons we loved living in…

[deleted]

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#42

When my wife and I lived in Bristol we developed a metric designed to measure how enjoyable a city was to live in that we called "time to sheep". Basically it's a measure of how long you have to travel from the center of the city before you're in the English countryside surrounded by sheep and the best cities have a low (but not too low) "time to sheep" metric. It helped explain one of the reasons we loved living in…

There needs to be a counterbalancing variable, though; presumably you want to live in a city, otherwise you'd just live in the countryside somewhere with a TTS of zero :) Maybe the other factor is "time for pizza to arrive at door"?

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#43

When my wife and I lived in Bristol we developed a metric designed to measure how enjoyable a city was to live in that we called "time to sheep". Basically it's a measure of how long you have to travel from the center of the city before you're in the English countryside surrounded by sheep and the best cities have a low (but not too low) "time to sheep" metric. It helped explain one of the reasons we loved living in…

There needs to be a counterbalancing variable, though; presumably you want to live in a city, otherwise you'd just live in the countryside somewhere with a TTS of zero :) Maybe the other factor is "time for pizza to arrive at door"?

there's presumably pizza in the smallest towns tho, I'd suggest Time To Theatre. Not because of the Theatre per se, but because "big enough to have a theatre" is probably a good proxy of "big enough to be appealing to people who enjoy something other than nature".

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This probably works best in Idaho

In the broadest possible sense, Idaho can be divided into "potato" and "non-potato" Idaho. For instance if you drive US95 through here (the creatively named Idaho County, Idaho) it's almost entirely wheat farms, and what isn't a wheat farm is either forest, wilderness or cattle ranch. The potato part doesn't really start until you get down into the whole valley/flat land area occupied by Meridian, Boise, Nampa, etc.…

(the creatively named Idaho County, Idaho)

New York County, New York says hi.

(You may know it as "Manhattan.")

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Although it's not quite sheep Newcastle has a Town Moor (Larger than Central Park) which has grazing cattle. There's also a farm not too far from the city centre which has grazing sheep. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_Moor,_Newcastle_upon_Tyne https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03hm60d/p03hm2x8 https://maps.app.goo.gl/vojeS3eDTFznpYwMA

I was going to say, I'm sure Desmond Dene has sheep there.

If you mean Jesmond Dene, there's a petting zoo with a few small beasts and birds. I know they have a couple of breeds of goat but I don't recall seeing any sheep on my last visit (within the last month).

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#48
post #27
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some years ago, I was looking for London hotels on some booking site, and noticed that they were listed as being so-and-so many km (with .1 or even .01 precision) from London, which seemed amusing given that they were all in London. So I fired up QGIS and drew a circle (in some suitable projection!) with the indicated radius around each hotel, and found that they intersected on Nelson’s Column in Trafalgar Square.

As the parent indicated, this stuff is surprisingly standardised in London. Distance is measured from Charing Cross. The Cross is near Nelson's Column, but I would be surprised if the column was actually the central point. As others have pointed out, this leads to some weirdness, as lots assume that the City (old London & older Roman London) would be the obvious place to measure things from.

In a similar vein, for New York City the official highway distance to the city is measured from Columbus Circle [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbus_Circle

Re: Where is London's most central sheep?

#49
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's Charing Cross: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charing_Cross#:~:text=Since%20... .

As a non British person I would think the center of the city would be some point equidistant centrally between the boundaries of the original roman city wall, in the square mile, but the actual center of the city seems to have migrated since then.

Anything that is south of the River Thames is considered "South" (prounounced "Souf" in MLE [1]), no matter the actual distance.

E.g. Waterloo Station would be considered South London but is actually at the same latitude as Buckingham Palace!

Hence why a Londoner would never describe Vauxhall as "Central".

Londoners would generally discount any part of this map south of the river from "Central London":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_London#/media/File:Ope...

Post reply on HN