As soon as I read the title of this post, the anecdote about the Grothendieck prime came to mind. Sure enough, the article kicks off with that very story! The article also links to https://www.ams.org/notices/200410/fea-grothendieck-part2.pd... which has an account of this anecdote. But the article does not reproduce the anecdote as stated in the linked document. So allow me to share it here as I've always found it q…
But it's not prime - what am I missing? Why is this anecdote significant?
Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
51–60 of 106 posts
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#52As soon as I read the title of this post, the anecdote about the Grothendieck prime came to mind. Sure enough, the article kicks off with that very story! The article also links to https://www.ams.org/notices/200410/fea-grothendieck-part2.pd... which has an account of this anecdote. But the article does not reproduce the anecdote as stated in the linked document. So allow me to share it here as I've always found it q…
But it's not prime - what am I missing? Why is this anecdote significant?
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#53ChatGPT o1: https://chatgpt.com/share/678feedb-0b2c-8001-bd77-4e574502e4... > Thought about large prime check for 3m 52s: "Despite its interesting pattern of digits, 12,345,678,910,987,654,321 is definitely not prime. It is a large composite number with no small prime factors." Feels like this Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) would be a good candidate for a hallucination benchmark...
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#54As soon as I read the title of this post, the anecdote about the Grothendieck prime came to mind. Sure enough, the article kicks off with that very story! The article also links to https://www.ams.org/notices/200410/fea-grothendieck-part2.pd... which has an account of this anecdote. But the article does not reproduce the anecdote as stated in the linked document. So allow me to share it here as I've always found it q…
But it's not prime - what am I missing? Why is this anecdote significant?
He was used to working on completely different levels of abstraction, so when faced with concrete numbers he could easily make a mistake that a school-child (or hacker news commenter) could spot.
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#55Doesn't take very much searching to find this pretty nifty palindrome prime: 3,212,123 (the 333rd palindrome prime) Interestingly, there are no four digit palindrome primes because they would be divisible by 11. This is obvious in retrospect but I found this fact by giving NotebookLM a big list of palindrome primes (just to see what it could possibly say about it over a podcast). For the curious, here's a small set o…
In fact, this holds for any even number of digits.
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#56> Sloane calls them “memorable” primes Excluding 11 seems arbitrary here.
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#57What's the use of notable prime numbers in cryptography? My understanding is that a lot of cryptography relies on secret prime numbers, so choosing a notable/memorable prime number is like choosing 1234 as your PIN. Are there places that need a prime that's arbitrary, large, and public?
Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#58Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#59Re: Prime numbers so memorable that people hunt for them
#60As soon as I read the title of this post, the anecdote about the Grothendieck prime came to mind. Sure enough, the article kicks off with that very story! The article also links to https://www.ams.org/notices/200410/fea-grothendieck-part2.pd... which has an account of this anecdote. But the article does not reproduce the anecdote as stated in the linked document. So allow me to share it here as I've always found it q…
One of my pet hobbies is trying to figure out the least prime prime number and most prime composite numbers under 100. My votes are 61 or 89 for least prime-seeming primes and 87 and --yep-- 57 for more prime-seeming composites.