Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 151 posts

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#51
Throughout human existence there have been only a few means of distribution of resources.

In hunter/gatherer days within small bands, and also to a large extent within families (but perhaps a bit less now) the method was Generalized Reciprocity[1], where people basically take care of each other and share. This was supported by the extremely fertile and bountiful forests and other resources that were shared between early people.

Later, the large "water monopoly" cultures like ancient Egypt had largely Redistributive economies, where resources flowed to the center (the Pharaoh, etc.) and were distributed again outwards.

Finally we got Market Exchange, where people bargain in the marketplace for goods, and this has been efficiently able (to a greater or lesser degree) to distribute resources for hundreds of years. Of course we have some redistributive elements like Social Security and Welfare, but these are limited.

Market Exchange relies now on basically everyone having a Job or another means to acquire money. But with automation this breaks down because jobs will more and more be taken by the AIs and then by robotic AIs.

So only a few possibilities are likely: either we end up with almost everyone a pauper and increase dole payments just up to the point where there's no revolution, or we somehow end up with everyone owning the AI resources and their output, taking the place the forests and other ancient resources played in hunter-gatherer days, and everyone can eventually be wealthy.

It looks as if, at least in the USA we are going down the path of having a tiny oligarch class with everyone else locked out of ownership of the products of the AI, but this may not be true everywhere, and perhaps somehow won't end up being true here.

[1] Stone Age Economics by Marshall Sahlins https://archive.org/details/stoneageeconomic0000sahl/page/n5...

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#52
> Can we just be real and just say we aren't advancing humanity with AI, it is just focused on automating out jobs.

These are the same thing.

Automation does advance humanity. The reason for the current world prosperity has been lots of automation.

(There is the separate and much more concerning risk of humans going the way of the horse, but that does not seem to be what you are concerned about)

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#53
What we need to admit is why we are so scared of this. Do you want to work? If nobody has to work then we are all permanently on holiday. Isn't that good? What are you afraid of here? We just get to spend all day making or finding things fun. Are people afraid because they have no meaning in their lives other than work? Do you need a boss? Are you scared because everyone will be equal and you won't be "special" any more? What is it? I'd really like to know specifically what people are afraid of.

Please just think about it a bit. Everyone seems to be thinking "I'll lose my job!" but what you need to be thinking is "everyone loses their job".

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#54
post #48

If we assume that very many people will be unemployed there will need to be a complete change in political focus towards supporting society rather than the individual. That is, wealth will need to be directed to those who need it rather than those who can grab it. The USA is one of the least politically prepared for that, but contains the wealth to resolve it. We will live in interesting times.

> That is, wealth will need to be directed to those who need it rather than those who can grab it.

That is a huge political change that will be strongly = resisted. Do you recognise the quote "to each according to his needs"? It is what you are suggesting, and the very opposite of the thinking that dominates the world (not just the US, these days).

> We will live in interesting times.

Certainly, but it will be very turbulent, and very likely violent. Even previously stable societies are clearly a lot less stable if you look at the political changes and the hostility between different political groups (the move from those on the other side being just "wrong" to being "evil" - "worse than Nazis" to quote a prominent British politician). I would say we live in scary times.

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#56
post #8

Yes, the idea of businesses is to reduce costs. Labor costs are a big expense. It's harder to do than it looks. Offshoring to places with lower wages has kept wages for many white- and blue-collar workers in the West from growing. But it is hard to do correctly. I suspect AI or AGI or AI with agents will take a longer time to actually work reliably than many suspect.

I agree, but, like offshoring, it does not have to work all that well to reduce demand by enough to have a significant impact on incomes.

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#57

What we need to admit is why we are so scared of this. Do you want to work? If nobody has to work then we are all permanently on holiday. Isn't that good? What are you afraid of here? We just get to spend all day making or finding things fun. Are people afraid because they have no meaning in their lives other than work? Do you need a boss? Are you scared because everyone will be equal and you won't be "special" any m…

> but what you need to be thinking is "everyone loses their job".

People realize the end goal, but it's naive to think that will happen overnight.

The road there could get really messy, with a lot of wealth redistribution while a few still hang on to their jobs. Not to mention the truly dystopian scenario where a few companies hold all the compute (and power).

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#58
I understand why _they_ would want to replace jobs with AI, but not why _we_ would want it. The democratic world as we know it is largely based on labour, and especially intellectual labour, having a lot of leverage. If it is no longer the case, most of people are not needed any more, and their opinion doesn't matter, as simple as that.

Not sure how you (as a worker) want to prepare for that - maybe by becoming depressed, quiet and atomized in advance. US leaders (political and big tech) seem to be preparing exactly for that now, but my assumption is you are not one of them.

Re: Ask HN: Can we just admit we want to replace jobs with AI?

#59
post #51

Throughout human existence there have been only a few means of distribution of resources. In hunter/gatherer days within small bands, and also to a large extent within families (but perhaps a bit less now) the method was Generalized Reciprocity[1], where people basically take care of each other and share. This was supported by the extremely fertile and bountiful forests and other resources that were shared between ea…

"It looks as if, at least in the USA we are going down the path of having a tiny oligarch class with everyone else locked out of ownership of the products of the AI, but this may not be true everywhere, and perhaps somehow won't end up being true here."

We are already headed towards that in every major economy, and all the others I know of too. Wealth and power started concentrating before AI, so its not just AI.

The group that has the wealth and power has the power to block change. They can distract the hoi polloi with scape goats (e.g. immigrants), culture wars, doomscrolling, day to day survival and a lot more.

The current trajectory is towards a global oligarchic class.

Post reply on HN