>I’m certain he wouldn’t be rude to my face, but he might quietly discriminate against me, say no thanks. He might not even think of it as discrimination, only that I don’t have what it takes. >I’m better at my job than most. I’d be a better startup founder today than I was in 2015. None of that will matter. IMHO, jumping to conclusions just like this is a big reason why 'going woke' isn't a healthy mindset for someo…
I Met Paul Graham Once
11–20 of 860 posts
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#12That put a bitter taste in my mouth that has gotten more bitter when the "promise" of a society led by technocrats has yielded a barrage of increasingly shitty and invasive products that don't provide any additional utility to anyone except the people who stand to profit from them. It's exhausting, extremely depressing, and if I had to do it again I probably would have avoided tech, as much as I like what I do - I feel a deep sense of shame sometimes at the state of how it's gone.
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#13Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#14>I’m certain he wouldn’t be rude to my face, but he might quietly discriminate against me, say no thanks. He might not even think of it as discrimination, only that I don’t have what it takes. >I’m better at my job than most. I’d be a better startup founder today than I was in 2015. None of that will matter. IMHO, jumping to conclusions just like this is a big reason why 'going woke' isn't a healthy mindset for someo…
This is not unique to "wokeness" and is in fact much more clearly expressed by people who are "anti-woke". Many folks just can't handle things that don't fit neatly into their (unexamined) categories about the world.
They'd rather destroy that person or thing rather than reflect and improve their understanding of the world.
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#15>I’m certain he wouldn’t be rude to my face, but he might quietly discriminate against me, say no thanks. He might not even think of it as discrimination, only that I don’t have what it takes. >I’m better at my job than most. I’d be a better startup founder today than I was in 2015. None of that will matter. IMHO, jumping to conclusions just like this is a big reason why 'going woke' isn't a healthy mindset for someo…
This feels like a pretty shallow reading of the article and you've fallen into the trap - described in the article itself - that "woke" is "some left-wing thing that I don't like". Whatever your views on trans issues, I think this article deserves a more thoughtful answer.
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#16You should have finished reading PG's essay. It's really quite narrowly scoped. There's no indication I could see that he doesn't still hold the same basically liberal politics (he included explicit disclaimers, for all the good that did); he might still be fine with transgender identity. He just wanted to talk about how the particular loudmouth brand of annoying leftist came to prominence. He even had a decent defin…
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#17Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#18Ironically the Wokeness article does what most people accuse "wokeness" of doing, predetermining its conclusion, and then shoehorning in a bunch of loosely connected facts and phenomena to support that assertion.
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#19Yes. But it's a disgrace that we're throwing the baby (genuine progress, like the slow acceptance of non-binary people) out with the bathwater.
Re: I Met Paul Graham Once
#20I like the article, but one doesn't need to meet pg once to get to know what he is. You can just read his tweets (x's?) and he, like many VCs or higher-ups in SV doesn't give a huge importance in how other humans feel, just in his kids/family/relatives. So overall, he doesn't care about how you think or feel. If he did, he wouldn't write an essay on a touchy topic without making a big disclaimer. By reading him tweet…