Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Most people also decide Most people didn't decide. Most people were tricked into using chrome. Most people are not computer literate.
[flagged]
I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
141–150 of 248 posts
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#142Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#143Question about the RSS spec: When pulling RSS, how do you know how often to poll? How do you know which items have been seen previously?
https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#optionalChannelEl...
ttl, skipHours, skipDays
Source: working on a feed reader (https://lighthouseapp.io/) and feed finder tool (https://lighthouseapp.io/tools/feed-finder).
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#144I cringe every time I see a feed that uses RSS and then pulls in Atom for some of elements. If you're going to do that, then just use Atom for the whole thing rather than building a frankenfeed.
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#145I recently added RSS to my personal site ( https://www.tyleo.com/ ) Even with a custom implementation it’s a simple thing to support. You can find the whole spec here: https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification I’ll mention that there is a competing Atom specification which is compatible with all notable RSS readers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(web_standard) . The POV I’ve seen on HN favors Atom because it off…
There's also this version, which I believe is the original: https://cyber.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html
It's far from perfect, but at least it's not infested with spammy advertising.
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#146As a general PSA, youtube channels have an RSS feed to alert you when a favourite creator releases a new video. The form is https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UC2wdo5v... where channel_id is the channel hash code which is buried in the source for the "nicely named" channel: https://www.youtube.com/@CuttingEdgeEngineering and can be found without source diving via (say) FeedBro (RSS browser extension)…
I worry about YouTube RSS feeds getting popular and Google killing them. Every time I see them discussed publicly I have this "Ssshh! Keep it on the down low!" reaction. I browse YouTube anonymously, have an ad blocker setup that pretty much eliminates all ads, and track my "subscriptions" with RSS. It's highly usable. I use a fork of tt-rss and actually embed the YouTube videos in the reader pane so I never see any…
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#147I absolutely love RSS format. It's one of the easiest ways for devs to get data and do something quickly with it. If you remember, Yahoo Pipies allowed devs & others quickly build something with RSS feeds. I've recently rebuilt and launched my own Yahoo Pipes clone https://www.mashups.io Along the way of building this tool, I came across a plenty of major websites that do not provide RSS feeds and indie devs who main…
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#148I recently added RSS to my personal site ( https://www.tyleo.com/ ) Even with a custom implementation it’s a simple thing to support. You can find the whole spec here: https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification I’ll mention that there is a competing Atom specification which is compatible with all notable RSS readers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(web_standard) . The POV I’ve seen on HN favors Atom because it off…
Atom exists because RSS is ambiguous and prone to breakage. The "bells and whistles" exist only because there were a lot of common extensions at the time that made sense to fold into Atom itself. Even if you use none of that and just the bits that overlap with RSS 2.0, your feed will be less likely to break in random feed readers, and that's enough reason to use Atom over RSS.
In this day and age, there's no good reason to use RSS over Atom beyond brand recognition.
(Yes, I'm still salty from the feed wars of the 2000s, but I still stand by all that I've written above.)
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#149> Please advocate for more RSS support - especially with orgs you want to stay up-to-date with. Also advocate for support with browser manufacturers. It used to be good, then one of them dropped it and the others blindly followed. People clearly want the RSS button, why on earth not provide it?
I use RSS heavily and I don't want an RSS button - what would that even do? RSS is best when integrated with a stateful server-side reader. Whatever comes with the browser will not be as good as an extension from a company focused on that feature. For example I use https://www.inoreader.com/
Who said that? It's meaningful if you read the feed across multiple devices, but lots of people read RSS on their computer only.
And even so browsers could provide RSS status synchronization. In fact almost every browser is already syncing your browsing history, bookmarks and settings if you are signed in.
> Whatever comes with the browser will not be as good as an extension...
not true.
Re: I've been advocating for RSS support, and you should too
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Most people also decide Most people didn't decide. Most people were tricked into using chrome. Most people are not computer literate.
When Chrome appeared HN was full of comments like "I switched all my family to Chrome, I recommend you do too".
Most people switched from Internet Explorer.
Firefox was never the "mainstream" choice.