Live data from Hacker News

Starship Flight 7

spacex.com

301–310 of 772 posts

Re: Starship Flight 7

#301

Looks like second stage broke up over Caribbean, videos of the debris (as seen from ground): https://x.com/deankolson87/status/1880026759133032662?t=HdHF... https://x.com/realcamtem/status/1880026604472266800 https://x.com/adavenport354/status/1880026262254809115 Moment of the breakup: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DE52_hVSeQz/

Watching those videos, my hand naturally looks for the roller ball from too much time playing missile command

Re: Starship Flight 7

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

States can set whatever rules they like internally. The US can make SpaceX pay them back if they want.

[flagged]

The President has very little case-by-case authority over civil liability between private parties.

I suppose Trump could advocate that Congress pass a new liability regime more favorable to SpaceX speciically or private launchers generally, though.

Re: Starship Flight 7

#303
post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fourth one (instagram) doesn't require login. Side note: annoying that twitter/X requires login. I'd have sworn Elon said he was removing that requirement to login to view tweets (I think he discussed it with George Hotz). Found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkNkSQ42jg4&t=49m30s Elon: > This is insane. You shouldn't need a twitter account at all unless you need to write something George: > Why did you put t…

Instagram requires login. Twitter does not.

I just closed the login prompt for the insta link, and watched the video. So it does prompt one to login, but it definitely isn't required to watch the video from that link

Re: Starship Flight 7

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The President has very little case-by-case authority over civil liability between private parties. I suppose Trump could advocate that Congress pass a new liability regime more favorable to SpaceX speciically or private launchers generally, though.

Time and time again, we have seen GOP congress critters kowtow to Trump even before he won the election. You think any of them are going to suddenly grow a backbone and stand up to him now? You think if Musk picks up the phone and starts "asking" people they will push back?

Re: Starship Flight 7

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I felt.. bad watching that breakup, it reminded me of Columbia.

I remember being woken up by the thunder from Columbia. Lost it over the years but I used to have a photo of about 20 vans of people parked on our property doing the search for debris. Don't think they found any on our land but there was a 3 ft chunk about 5 miles down the road.

I remember waiting for the sonic boom, that never came…

Re: Starship Flight 7

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the flight termination system is sort of a shaped charge that's designed to rupture the oxidizer and fuel tanks. Even if only a few % fuel remains, it'll be a big boom.

It wasn't FTS, it just blew up: https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1880033318936199643

Oh interesting, maybe that's why the debris looked so interesting

Re: Starship Flight 7

#307
post #243
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a strangely beautiful sight. While I was excited to see ship land, I'm also happy I get to see videos of this!

Looks like something out of a sci-fi movie.

The number of SpaceX video clips that I know are "actual things really happening" which still activate the involuntary "Sci-Fi / CGI effect" neurons in my brain is remarkable.

Re: Starship Flight 7

#308
post #4

Anyone care to give the non spacey folks like me the highlights of this launch?

Space X has failed after 3 billion US tax payer dollars to take a banana into low earth orbit. Needless to say we aren't going to Mars last year watching a woman in a long dress floating in the cargo bay behind a curtain of glass windows playing a violin for entertaining the dozens of astronaut's which don't have space for food, water, belongings or life support.

> Space X has failed after 3 billion US tax payer dollars to take a banana into low earth orbit

Literally just lofted some satellites.

Re: Starship Flight 7

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I take it if SpaceX debris hit and destroyed a boat the owner can claim damages from SpaceX? Does international space law allow for this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Liability_Convention Only used once, when the Soviets dropped a nuclear reactor on Canada. > States (countries) bear international responsibility for all space objects that are launched within their territory. This means that regardless of who launches the space object, if it was launched from State A's territory, or from State A's facility, or if State A caused the launch to happe…

Does the thing have to have got into space and then come back for this to apply?

Re: Starship Flight 7

#310
post #197

I wonder if the second stage failure was related to the metal flap seen here on the very left of the image: https://imgur.com/a/VS8IPdv

I watched this with my very young daughter and she pointed that out, she will be fascinated if that is the case!
Post reply on HN