Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

Considering the current numbering scheme, 0.9 will be the unstable version of 1.0. Which means 0.9 should give us a very good idea of the final backwards compatible API (hopefully)

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#5

Post by elliotlai » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 8:27 PM UTC

Streams are everywhere, as an abstraction of async I/O model. Hope the Stream API will have a cleanup by 1.0.

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#6

Post by JakaJancar » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 9:11 PM UTC

dschwartz88 wrote: post #4

Considering the current numbering scheme, 0.9 will be the unstable version of 1.0. Which means 0.9 should give us a very good idea of the final backwards compatible API (hopefully)

Or it might be the unstable version of 0.10.

The dots are there for a reason.

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#7

Post by feronull » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 9:25 PM UTC

JakaJancar wrote: post #6

dschwartz88 wrote: post #4

Considering the current numbering scheme, 0.9 will be the unstable version of 1.0. Which means 0.9 should give us a very good idea of the final backwards compatible API (hopefully)

Or it might be the unstable version of 0.10. The dots are there for a reason.

imo next version will be 1.0 because they are on the fast releasing period

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#8

Post by feronull » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 9:25 PM UTC

farhanpatel wrote: post #2

Might be smart to mention in the title that its just an unstable release.

every odd version is unstable

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#9

Post by JakaJancar » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 9:30 PM UTC

feronull wrote: post #7

JakaJancar wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or it might be the unstable version of 0.10. The dots are there for a reason.

imo next version will be 1.0 because they are on the fast releasing period

Possibly, I'm just commenting on the logic that 0.9 is followed by 1.0 (or 1.9 by 2.0, if you want).

Re: Node.js v0.9.0 (Unstable) is out

#10

Post by aaronblohowiak » Fri, Jul 20, 2012, 9:42 PM UTC

JakaJancar wrote: post #6

dschwartz88 wrote: post #4

Considering the current numbering scheme, 0.9 will be the unstable version of 1.0. Which means 0.9 should give us a very good idea of the final backwards compatible API (hopefully)

Or it might be the unstable version of 0.10. The dots are there for a reason.

IMHO, it should be followed by 0.12, because 0.10 is too confusable with 0.1, but 0.12 is clearly a new version...