how much more confirmation do we need that we are in a recession?
Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
21–30 of 432 posts
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#22Part of Zucks plan to stop hiring mid-level engineers this year (as he said on JRE)? I am very very skeptical of this idea - what do you all think?
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/22/mark-zuckerberg-envisions-1-...
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#23how much more confirmation do we need that we are in a recession?
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#24Next up: We need you to come in 5 days a week. Think of our culture!
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#25Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#26Putting all of the employees on notice to keep their heads down and do their jobs without comment or complaint.
Should make all those people complaining about the DEI change shut up, the timing of the announcement is so close it is hard not to think they're related.
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#27Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#28Performance reviews are bullshit. Being a "low performer" at Meta might mean you are not a suck-up, or that you have a sense of ethics.
Performance reviews aren't bullshit - it's crucial to have an objective (as objective as possible) system for measuring performance both to reward your high performers and to understand your low performers whether to provide support or to document reasons for firing them. Several kinds of performance management system such as mandatory percentages for each rating level ARE bullshit, but without performance management…
Re: Meta announces 5% cuts in preparation for 'intense year'
#29Performance reviews are bullshit. Being a "low performer" at Meta might mean you are not a suck-up, or that you have a sense of ethics.
Performance reviews aren't bullshit - it's crucial to have an objective (as objective as possible) system for measuring performance both to reward your high performers and to understand your low performers whether to provide support or to document reasons for firing them. Several kinds of performance management system such as mandatory percentages for each rating level ARE bullshit, but without performance management…
I think we need to embrace the idea that whether you are given raises, promotions, continued employment, etc is largely a function of whether your manager likes you, likes having you on their team, and wants to reward you. And if they don't like you, it doesn't matter how good your numbers are now they will find a way to get rid of you sooner or later. It's better to just get it over with, give the employee a generous severance package, and part ways (or transfer them to another team that's interested in them).