Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
31–40 of 106 posts
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#32From hunter gatherer society to day, every time a new technology comes along that claims to make life ‘easier,’ it pushes us further into being slave-adjacent. We have phones, ChatGPT, Google, and smartphones—but for what? We end up working more and more. The greater the technological progress, the more our lives are exploited to generate profits for our corporate overlords. ChatGPT will save you time but your boss w…
I'll elaborate a bit more though...
In a capitalist world, it will always seek to maximize profits. Human suffering, animal suffering, morality, and so on are basically irrelevant.
Someone willing to exploit human happiness for an extra 2% gain, will wipe out the competition if they are unwilling to do the same. So everything is guaranteed to spiral in a race to the bottom.
So with a new tool, as every time before, it will be a race to the bottom to see how can most unethically use AI to exploit value.
Whether we end up as slaves, or starving on the street remains to be seen. But the odds of humanity being better off without a sharp course correction and regulation by the government, are very low.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#33One day they're going to want only senior engineers, but with AI taking all the mid-level jobs there won't be any seniors.
In the SFBA, Lockheed hires welders who can get a security clearance.
Someone I know was in their 70s working there, because there isn't a large pipeline of welders to pull from. In his words, "there's a bunch of great guys with steady hands delivering doordash, because it pays better than being an apprentice in a body shop".
Most automotive welders can't get a clearance, the true factory welding jobs no longer pay well or are automated away.
In response, the old Martinez chevrolet factory welders are continuing to work in Lockheed with larger than normal incentives to stick around past their medicare and social security pay.
Most of them would rather be training new guys (or girls, apparently half of the good new welders are women), but most of the time there's nobody new who comes in.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#34One day they're going to want only senior engineers, but with AI taking all the mid-level jobs there won't be any seniors.
The common theme from these CEO's is today is the worst AI will ever be. (who knows if thats true, not me)
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#35The logical AI consequence for Facebook is not that they'll be able to save on salaries, it is that people will (and already are) getting tired of the Internet and will visit Facebook less.
But it fits with the coordinated effort between Starmer's AI hype and the new fake MAGA team of Musk, Sacks, etc.
I'm sure that replacing workers is exactly what Trump voters hoped for! Let us see how the Bannon/Musk row plays out.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#36Great, more midlevel engineers for me. I genuinely cannot see how AI is going to be bad for programmers. It doesnt do the entire job. It does snippits and you must integrate everything. (And if it does the entire job, amazing! Maybe we can spend extra time on a good UI or extra unit tests) AI could reduce our staff by half, but that isnt what happens. Instead we just get more work done. The productivity increase seem…
Thank you, this is what I've been trying to say for awhile now. It feels like people are assuming that there's only so much work that can actually be done, and I don't think that's what happens in practice; instead we figure out how to exploit the resources more instead of doing "the same with less". Basically I feel most people are not thinking in terms of Gustafson's Law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson%27s…
For some of my smaller projects, AI makes them vastly more efficient to do, but it is far from the hacker-style type of work they started as. For many of them, the human communication, typing the change request into ChatGPT, and pasting the new code into the file are all that remain of the work.
Memory and storage used to be precious resources in the computing world, but now nobody blinks at shipping webpages that are 5MB, APIs that take 3 seconds because there is now a spinner to distract people, or entire browser instances for a calculator.
I know a few software devs that didn't take that transition well as they loved knowing the little details and then the paradigm changed to "nobody cares."
Dev used to be an option for a quiet solitary job. I can see that type of role disappearing.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#37The future for programmers is not bright. Consequently the future for bug hunters and security professionals is very bright.
What makes you think adversarial AIs can't do the job of bug hunters and security professionals too?
Generative AI can't think, it can only mimic.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#38Obviously, not on its own. I still needed to give it guidelines and feedback on what to do next. But i could improve my site while watching TV. This was science-fiction just 2 years ago.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#39Re: Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
#40Social Media itself can be replaced if ChatGPT or what ever just takes everyone's chat history and connects us directly to people who care about similar interests.
I don't give a shit about getting the worlds Attention if only 6 people in the world actually care about the things I care about. Social Media's current architecture is pure shit.