Live data from Hacker News

Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

cbc.ca

261–270 of 400 posts

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#261
Given the amount of money floating around in the Olympic system, it's ridiculous that athletes don't get paid properly.

Leaving aside the whole drug aspect of the Enhanced Games, at least they are committing to pay athletes properly.

Also these are the salaries of the IoC directors: https://www.sportandpolitics.de/ioc-directors-salaries-2024-...

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#262
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would assume that not everyone with a "great body" would want to do stripping and I don't think it is a "no brainer" at all. Problem with many sports is that they just don't earn enough money, which mostly is in advertising, and that doing it professionally is rather costly.

100% I'd strip. Putting that much toil in I'd want maximum compensation

Not everyone has such little self-worth.

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#263
post #106

Being a former athlete (100/200 meters), the issue is that the top-tier sports (e.g., football, volleyball, basketball, etc.) capture the majority of money/value, and if you are from javelin throwing, fencing, or racewalking, unless you have a great sponsor, it will definitely require personal sacrifices to make it to the games. In Brazil a very long time ago, there was a gigantic tug of war between the top-tier spor…

Fencing as done now looks legit stupid, so does racewalking. Javelin, while slightly more cool, is you throwing a stick. Mildly interesting for a few seconds. Football is a top tier sport because it's entertaining. People will pay to see it. Hence there's money to be earned. If someone wants to spend their time seeing how far they can throw a stick, cool, but they shouldn't be surprised they're waking up to an empty…

What looks stupid and cool is purely subjective.

Fencing is hard to follow because its fast and movements are subtle.

> If someone wants to spend their time seeing how far they can throw a stick, cool, but they shouldn't be surprised they're waking up to an empty bank account every day.

But if someone wants to see how well they can kick a ball its somehow worth paying them?

The biggest factor here is that team sports are brandable and build brand loyalty in a way individual sports cannot.

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#265

Given the amount of money floating around in the Olympic system, it's ridiculous that athletes don't get paid properly. Leaving aside the whole drug aspect of the Enhanced Games, at least they are committing to pay athletes properly. Also these are the salaries of the IoC directors: https://www.sportandpolitics.de/ioc-directors-salaries-2024-...

Late stage capitalism - why would they pay athletes properly?

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fencing as done now looks legit stupid, so does racewalking. Javelin, while slightly more cool, is you throwing a stick. Mildly interesting for a few seconds. Football is a top tier sport because it's entertaining. People will pay to see it. Hence there's money to be earned. If someone wants to spend their time seeing how far they can throw a stick, cool, but they shouldn't be surprised they're waking up to an empty…

What looks stupid and cool is purely subjective. Fencing is hard to follow because its fast and movements are subtle. > If someone wants to spend their time seeing how far they can throw a stick, cool, but they shouldn't be surprised they're waking up to an empty bank account every day. But if someone wants to see how well they can kick a ball its somehow worth paying them? The biggest factor here is that team sports…

No, the biggest factor is that certain sports are more entertaining than others - even individual sports - and I'd pay to watch some but not others. I'd pay more to watch cyclists do the tour de france or tony hawk go on a half-pipe or Mike Tyson fight someone than someone do a long jump; it's just more fun!

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100% I'd strip. Putting that much toil in I'd want maximum compensation

Not everyone has such little self-worth.

Are you commenting on the GP? Because if I had any self-worth, I would 100% strip[^1].

[^1]: As it is, I still dream and go to the gym every day.

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#268
post #106

Being a former athlete (100/200 meters), the issue is that the top-tier sports (e.g., football, volleyball, basketball, etc.) capture the majority of money/value, and if you are from javelin throwing, fencing, or racewalking, unless you have a great sponsor, it will definitely require personal sacrifices to make it to the games. In Brazil a very long time ago, there was a gigantic tug of war between the top-tier spor…

Fencing as done now looks legit stupid, so does racewalking. Javelin, while slightly more cool, is you throwing a stick. Mildly interesting for a few seconds. Football is a top tier sport because it's entertaining. People will pay to see it. Hence there's money to be earned. If someone wants to spend their time seeing how far they can throw a stick, cool, but they shouldn't be surprised they're waking up to an empty…

> Football is a top tier sport because it's entertaining.

Some dudes running and kicking a ball from left to right for 90+ minutes? They’re not even allowed to fight…

From all the sports this is certainly one of the most boring ones.

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#269

System working as designed? Like, if your hobby is throwing a disc as far as you can, have fun. But don't expect many people to pay to watch right? But people pay a whole lot to see nice bodies doing sexual stuff. So since money comes from what other people value, no need for a surprised Pikachu face.

Well the IOC makes an enormous amount of money that has to come from somewhere. That is a reflection of the demand. Tickets are extremely expensive and the deals for live broadcast also involve huge amounts of money, which broadcasters wouldn't pay if they didn't think many would watch. The point of this article is simply that a bigger fraction of that money should go to the athletes. They are prevented in various ways from bargaining collectively.

Re: Olympians turn to OnlyFans to fund dreams due to 'broken' finance system (2024)

#270
post #256
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But don't expect many people to pay to watch right? Why did you ignore the fact from the article that people do pay to watch (it's one of the most watched events in the world) it's just that that money doesn't reach the athletes? Not sure which pokemon represents that

First quote from Google-Search: "The International Olympic Committee (IOC) generated US$902 million in revenue for the 2023 financial year."

That's less to do with people paying to watch someone throw a disc as far as they can, and more to do with corporations understanding that putting the Olympic logo on a shirt increases sales.
Post reply on HN