NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
11–20 of 84 posts
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#12Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#13Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#14Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#15Prompting Claude to make SVGs then dropping them into Inkscape and getting the last ~20% of it to match the picture in my head has been a phenomenal user experience for me. This, too, piques my curiosity..!
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#16Prompting Claude to make SVGs then dropping them into Inkscape and getting the last ~20% of it to match the picture in my head has been a phenomenal user experience for me. This, too, piques my curiosity..!
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#17[flagged]
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#18"Code coming soon" - I hope someone reposts this when there's more to dig into
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#19Why does the fourth example show a hamburger but is labeled as a dragon?
Re: NeuralSVG: An Implicit Representation for Text-to-Vector Generation
#20I’d also like to see this in music generation. Tools like Suno are cool but I would much rather have something that generates MIDIs and instrument configurations instead.
Maybe this is a good lesson for generative tools. It’s possible to generate something that’s a good starting point. But what people actually want is long tail, so including the capability of precision modification is the difference between a canned demo and a powerful tool.
> Code coming soon
The examples are quite nice but I have no idea how reproducible they are.