Untitled topic
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: undefined
#2Is this bad because he is trying to associate more things with the USA, or good because America is two whole continent where Mexico is just a country.
Re: undefined
#3Re: undefined
#4Now I am in a debate. Is this bad because he is trying to associate more things with the USA, or good because America is two whole continent where Mexico is just a country.
I’m surprised he isn’t trying to name it the Gulf of Texas or the Gulf of Florida. Personally I think the Gulf of Ohio has a nice ring to it. We have already taken over Pasadena, California and the entire state of South Carolina as things currently stand.
Re: undefined
#5Re: undefined
#6Now I am in a debate. Is this bad because he is trying to associate more things with the USA, or good because America is two whole continent where Mexico is just a country.
If somehow the name were to be changed I think your later point wouldn’t make much sense. It would be associated with the United States of America, not North or South America or even “America” if it referred to both continents. Nobody in Belize or Paraguay or Cuba is under the impression that renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America is for hemispheric unity… I’m surprised he isn’t trying to name it the Gulf…
Re: undefined
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
If somehow the name were to be changed I think your later point wouldn’t make much sense. It would be associated with the United States of America, not North or South America or even “America” if it referred to both continents. Nobody in Belize or Paraguay or Cuba is under the impression that renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America is for hemispheric unity… I’m surprised he isn’t trying to name it the Gulf…
Gulf of Trump have better change than Texas or Ohio.