After reading the introductory page, I don't see any benefit over Quarto, and in fact some limitations in comparison.
I'd use myst for docs, it's simpler, lighter, and interlinks well. Quarto is more for publications.
Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
41–47 of 47 posts
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#42Is there a way to write a myst markdown file for one page, a tex file for another linked page, and have them both compile to html seamlessly? I have been doing this with markdown + pandoc for my web page, and I wonder if there is something richer than plain markdown to use for my non-latex content.
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#43As a notorious Markdown critic, I have to say, their syntax really looks like a decent attempt of support for technical and scientific documents. Having used reStructuredText for a thesis with a lot of bells and whistles, and having used org-mode mostly ever since, I am not just admitting it willy-nilly. Then of course some of its syntax and syntax concepts are straight out of reStructuredText's book, so it makes sen…
The only implementation of restructured text is the docutils-Sphinx ecosystem. MyST Markdown was designed as a nicer language for Markdown-familiar authoring: https://executablebooks.org/en/latest/blog/2020-08-07-announ...
In the myst-md project, we're applying many of the lessons that we learned in the Jupyter Book project. One of the big takeaways is that the tooling is equally as important as the underlying markup, and docutils/Sphinx was holding us back in a few areas.
If you like links within documents, take a look at embedding (https://mystmd.org/guide/embed) and cross-referencing (https://mystmd.org/guide/cross-references)
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#44After reading the introductory page, I don't see any benefit over Quarto, and in fact some limitations in comparison.
For UX, we think that MyST has a lot of nice bells and whistles, but we really need to author a blog post or documentation page to clarify the user-facing differences!
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#45As a notorious Markdown critic, I have to say, their syntax really looks like a decent attempt of support for technical and scientific documents. Having used reStructuredText for a thesis with a lot of bells and whistles, and having used org-mode mostly ever since, I am not just admitting it willy-nilly. Then of course some of its syntax and syntax concepts are straight out of reStructuredText's book, so it makes sen…
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#46I've really had a pet peeve about footnotes on mobile and this does the crime. If you click a footnote and it jumps very far away and doesn't have a return navigation, I have left your page usually after the second time I see a footnote and didn't note my exact scroll. A small thing but pretty please don't make me have to hunt for where I was...
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#47I've really had a pet peeve about footnotes on mobile and this does the crime. If you click a footnote and it jumps very far away and doesn't have a return navigation, I have left your page usually after the second time I see a footnote and didn't note my exact scroll. A small thing but pretty please don't make me have to hunt for where I was...
Oh, it turns out we already do this! A small bugfix to make these always-visible on mobile displays :) https://github.com/jupyter-book/myst-theme/issues/513