Earlier quoted context omitted.
> reducing their IQ by 2.5 to 3 points I seem to recall reading an article that observed that every time we do a study of the effect of lead exposure on IQ, it gets larger. IQs aren't changing much, but lead exposure is going down, and so we keep imputing the same IQ gaps to ever-smaller quantities of lead.
IQs aren't changing much Isn't IQ a comparative representation of one's standing within their contemporary age group? My understanding is that within a given group the median should be 100. So you won't see it change between groups. This is highly relevant when you're talking about different groups being exposed to different concentrations of lead. As an extreme example to make the point, if people born in 1970 were…
Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
61–70 of 176 posts
Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#62Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#63Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#64Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#65Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#66> Roman Empire’s use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds I'm not a fan of this phrasing. None of the findings had anything to do with measuring IQ levels in ancient Europe. They were about measuring historical levels of lead, which they then just plugged into modern models to presume some levels of cognitive effects. A study that was actually able to measure cognitive disparities and correlate them w…
Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
IQs aren't changing much Isn't IQ a comparative representation of one's standing within their contemporary age group? My understanding is that within a given group the median should be 100. So you won't see it change between groups. This is highly relevant when you're talking about different groups being exposed to different concentrations of lead. As an extreme example to make the point, if people born in 1970 were…
AFAIK, no, 100 IQ points at 25 and 18 or any other age are the same "brain power".
Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#68Roman lead pipes were not a significant factor on the health of humans back then... To the same extent as public sewers, bathing, hygiene rules etc. Rome had it a lot better than even some countries today. Yeah you still had to deal with infections and such which could have been deadly but time and medicine era that you were in you had way better health outcomes in Rome
Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#69So if my generation had lead levels 3-4 X higher than Roman kids, does this explain the “Exams are getting easier” meme - that exams are staying the same, but kids really are getting smarter …
( also the hey exams were waaay harder in the Edwardian Era meme?)
Re: Roman Empire's use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds
#70> Roman Empire’s use of lead lowered IQ levels across Europe, study finds I'm not a fan of this phrasing. None of the findings had anything to do with measuring IQ levels in ancient Europe. They were about measuring historical levels of lead, which they then just plugged into modern models to presume some levels of cognitive effects. A study that was actually able to measure cognitive disparities and correlate them w…
This is one of the problems with modern academia. It's hard to extrapolate these things
Some of the social sciences are terrible at this. A former partner was a researcher in one of what I now consider to be less respectable fields and she would come up with a feely conclusion and fit the data to it and publish it. Wanted me to co-author one with her and do the statistical analysis. Told her I don't want to be on Retraction Watch.