Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why wouldn't it be? Education's job is to prepare students for life in the real world, and life in the real world is often a competition with your peers. When I was in grade school (admittedly close to 20 years ago) we had accelerated and slowed tracks for students starting in 5th grade.
I mean, they should probably prepare people with knowledge of taxes and investing then. The competition is very obvious in societies with a lot of wealth disparity. In Europe there tends to be less disparity and less competition. US, China, India, UK, etc, much more disparity so it’s much more important for kids to be ‘top of the field’.
Fully agree.
> The competition is very obvious in societies with a lot of wealth disparity. In Europe there tends to be less disparity and less competition.
Fascinating observation! Wonder if that shows up at the school level as well? For example, In the US the highest/lowest performing schools tend to correlate to high/low income areas and have significant disparity in quality of education, and I expect this is a strongly self-reinforcing trend towards elite private institutions.