Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
31–40 of 47 posts
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#32Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#33 {rolename}`and here is my role's content!`
I would personally prefer something like Tex here. You just need backslashes, square brackets and braces.I guess this is inspired by Restructured Text. Not a fan of that—it looks like the most punctuation-heavy lightweight markup language.
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#34I note that it provides a different dialect of md compared to Obsidian, especially the syntax for admonitions. If one would stray that far, why not AsciiDoc? Myst provides an AST-spec, but I doubt it would be easy to integrate that into Obsidian. Maybe other can shed light on it?
And why AsciiDoc in particular? It lists the inspirations for the beyond-Markdown features.
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#35Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#36As a notorious Markdown critic, I have to say, their syntax really looks like a decent attempt of support for technical and scientific documents. Having used reStructuredText for a thesis with a lot of bells and whistles, and having used org-mode mostly ever since, I am not just admitting it willy-nilly. Then of course some of its syntax and syntax concepts are straight out of reStructuredText's book, so it makes sen…
Org-mode has a new maintainer, and he has invited contributions of source code: https://emacsconf.org/2024/talks/org-update/
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#37Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#38As a notorious Markdown critic, I have to say, their syntax really looks like a decent attempt of support for technical and scientific documents. Having used reStructuredText for a thesis with a lot of bells and whistles, and having used org-mode mostly ever since, I am not just admitting it willy-nilly. Then of course some of its syntax and syntax concepts are straight out of reStructuredText's book, so it makes sen…
You can create an anchor:
(my-anchor)=
...and then link to it: [see here](#my-anchor)
(https://mystmd.org/guide/cross-references)Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#39I've really had a pet peeve about footnotes on mobile and this does the crime. If you click a footnote and it jumps very far away and doesn't have a return navigation, I have left your page usually after the second time I see a footnote and didn't note my exact scroll. A small thing but pretty please don't make me have to hunt for where I was...
Re: Myst Markdown – Markdown for technical/scientific document
#40This is my favorite syntax for technical writing, but unfortunately the only complete implementation is in Python. There are half-finished JS projects (last I checked) but nothing else. I really wish they were complete so we could use this in more places. I opted for Djot ( https://djot.net ) as a second-place alternative with support for many more languages. My use case was attempting a Sphinx alternative in TypeScr…
> a Sphinx alternative in TypeScript.
We have some unfortunate naming that follows from history. The Python tools you're referring to are a distinct project. The Jupyter Book project saw the development of many of those tools, and is now pivotting to a new engine MyST-MD that this article links to!
Why do you say that these tools aren't complete? Whilst we are certainly not "done", these tools are being used in many places, such as https://proceedings.scipy.org/2024
Looking forward to hearing from you!