Live data from Hacker News

Why are corporations cutting managers?

arnoldkling.substack.com

21–30 of 63 posts

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#21
Remember that about 3-4 years ago, we experienced the Great Migration. The percentage of tech workers who moved to new companies was very high compared with historical migration patterns. Interests rates were still very low, companies had been buoyed by pandemic-related assistance, and inflation hadn't yet set in, so the salaries that were being offered were very attractive.

In the years since, the incentives to leave one's current employer have decreased. Salaries have stagnated, there's been belt tightening and layoffs, the pool of applicants competing for the same jobs has become bigger, and a lot of folks who've gotten cushy benefits like permanent WFH arrangements would have to go back to the office if they changed jobs.

But that means that a lot of tech companies are experiencing lower than normal attrition, but there's still professional growth happening, and the only way the companies have been able to reward employees is through promotions. That has led to bloat at the management layer, which this year many companies have tried to address, either by letting managers go or sending them back into IC roles.

I predict that due to "tenure lock" (where a lot of people who moved in the Great Migration have the same tenure at their current company) we're likely to hit a watershed moment that leads to another Great Migration later in the decade.

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#22
post #5

Not terribly insightful. The question in the headline is not answered.

It wasn’t mean to.

The entire last paragraph was a bunch of questions meant to invoke discussions and theories.

It has no ads, the author is already a well known economist and has nothing to prove for trying to be a “thought leader”.

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#23
post #2

This is all over news but is this actually true. Meta is always citied as example because Mark said and did bunch of things to appease the markets. There are no reduction in numbers at meta now. Middle managers have made a comeback at meta big time. CEOs love middle managers despite what they say to investors. Even the numbers cited in the article are not convincing > middle-manager head counts by about 6% since the…

Why would Mark care about appeasing the market? He has a controlling interest in Meta and can’t be fired no matter what the market thinks.

You can accuse Meta of a lot of things. But being short term focused is not one.

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#25

A number of corporations are going to learn hard lessons from indiscriminate cutting of middle management, like when Google thought they were being innovative in not having much management a long time ago.

I think as with everything, it depends on what end of the spectrum your company is at.

There are a lot companies, Volkswagen to name a prominent example, that have over time built up massive management layers that don't ultimately serve the company goals.

Getting rid of excess is something that is necessary because they have ballooned to expensive and unhealthy proportions.

Having none at all or too little obviously also has downsides.

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#28

Corporations cut managers because they're expensive. Not having enough managers is also expensive though.

Having too many also causes endless politics, empire building, meetings, etc, etc. Much more expensive than too few. They need to justify their existence somehow and since they can't directly drive features and you can only optimize a team so much that eventually ends in bureaucratic hell.

Re: Why are corporations cutting managers?

#29
post #4

I find this article doesn't really say much of substance nor does it have hard facts to back it its claims related to the title. It really is just an observation piece - there are cuts and here are some very general theories without evidence. I didn't really gain much reading it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42611851
Post reply on HN