Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even though saying "small nitpick" is redundant in terms of its literal meaning (denotation), communication is about more than simple denotation. It's also about emphasis, tone, and emotions, and saying "small nitpick" can be a good way to soften criticism and add a little humility and politeness.
This particular linguistic construct is called a pleonasm! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleonasm
Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
291–300 of 304 posts
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#292Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#293This is why people shouldn't use Vercel. The last thing you want is a message like this when people come to your site.
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just went through the code signing odyssey. It is a racket, but it did not take me a month. It took me a week and a half, including integration in to automated builds.
How do the automated builds work? When I tried this five years ago a hardware dongle needed to be connected to the build machine.
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the distinction between "tuna" and "tuna fish" (tuna salad) was likely just something we made up in our own family. Maybe even just a way for us kids to prank our mom, or vice versa. "Do you want tuna, or tuna fish?" OTOH, "tuna fish" was indeed a common phrase back in those days (mid 20th century) as a synonym for canned tuna. It appeared on tuna can labels and advertisements. Here are some examples: https:/…
This thread reads like AIs talking to each other. Bizarre.
I did use Miss Chatty (ChatGPT 4o) as a research assistant, and cited my discussion with her in my comment.
If you don't mind, I am curious to learn what signals in my comments led you to think that I am an AI. :-)
Maybe there is something you know about me that I don't know!
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's unnecessarily flippant, even if it were just an ffmpeg wrapper do you imagine every person is a software developer who knows how to use the command line? This is clearly geared toward content creators. And even though I am technical I usually use random websites from Google to accomplish this stuff, looking up magic ffmpeg commands is (not fun)[1]. Actually ran into a random issue before where the first result…
> the first result for "convert video to MP4 with ffmpeg" would produce files not playable by Quicktime on Mac, you needed to pass in some other codec argument to make it work. So even ffmpeg is not a panacea for technical folks. MP4 files use the MPEG-4 container format. It’s confusing at first why a .mp4 file would play somewhere and elsewhere not, until one looks into the difference of a container format and a vid…
In any event, it's unexpected that the default configuration of ffmpeg produces an MP4 unplayable on Mac. Looks like "pix_fmt yuv420p" is what's needed.
Side note I'm remembering now why I needed to do this, some dev tooling produces WebP video files which can't be uploaded everywhere.
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Distribution, marketing and running it is the hard part, not building software. I consider libraries to be like roads, it's a communal good if you will. Feel free to build and run these apps yourself in the open instead of complaining. You will see how time consuming that is.
Building a road is usually very similar to building another road. Building ffmpeg is very different from an SSL lib. They need different tradeoffs, design strategies, domain knowledge, etc. And doing them properly is really really hard. A lot of software out there sucks, in part because there is more focus on marketing than on correctness and reliability. If roads had the same quality as software then traffic deaths…
> Building a road is usually very similar to building another road.
It's a similar process, but so is building software. That's entirely besides my point though, which you seem to have missed entirely.
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
This thread reads like AIs talking to each other. Bizarre.
Really? I can assure you that everything I said was my own writing. I did use Miss Chatty (ChatGPT 4o) as a research assistant, and cited my discussion with her in my comment. If you don't mind, I am curious to learn what signals in my comments led you to think that I am an AI. :-) Maybe there is something you know about me that I don't know!
But don't mind me. Just found it curious. You don't seem like an AI from your profile, but these days one can't be sure anymore. Cheers!
Re: Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
#299Looks great, beautiful landing page and it looks like a labor of love! - Most of the page titles are the (same)[1] which doesn't seem good for SEO. Each of the pages like "Pricing" or "Compress Your Video Files" should be differently named. - The "video compressor" tool would be much more useful if you could enter a target file size. This is a frequent use case, if you want to send a video over email or social media…
> beautiful landing page I disagree. Any page that sports a big "buy now" button without even scrolling but has at that point not even shown me a single screenshot will have a hard time catching my attention. I didn't look further.
Would love to see examples of nice landing pages that _don’t_ do this and also aren’t big enough companies that you’ve already heard of them (10b plus companies may not need to do this as they’ve earned the scroll in brand recognition and likely have more than one product line).