Canada needs people? I thought the recent controversy is all about Canada having too many people and the pro immigration government also taking a more tempered immigration stance?
Canada has a population of 40 million in a land area larger than the USA. That's hardly "too many people". Too many people in a handful of dense urban centers maybe, but overall the country is basically empty.
That's because those immigrants came here because they wanted to be Canadians. These new immigrants have no desire to integrate.
Idk the Amish are pretty chill for not integrating. And if immigrants come and integrate into existing gang culture, would you actually be happy? I think it is ok to just say “we don’t want poor immigrants. We want immigrants with something to offer.”
The Amish have been here since colonial times and they live in their own communities and engage in seemingly cordial commerce with us “English”. They don’t even collect Social Security. They might not be integrated but they leave everyone else alone.
one of the carabean island countrys, tried to join
Canada, they were already useing Canadian money.
We (canada) said no, cause they would leave there island and move north for free health care, which is like ok, here wana trade houses?
But the EU?, joining canada, yah right, bunch of snooty hosers, they are already trying to put in private airports for there private jets.
And there are countless EU beurocrats who have moved over and are working in government here, they like small towns....
And as for imigrants from india/asia, plenty of friction there, with a large number of names from
those places showing up in the court docs(availible online....), and then many of the best talents from over there, 1 not planing on settling and 2 traveling back home for medical treatment.....even those who are working in health care,here.
Brampton, Ont, is already a punjabi city.,.....
samosas 3 for a dollar....and litteraly no euro
origin people in sight, at the bank and grocery store.
A bit of whats going.
Traffic jams in places where that was impossible?, yup!, every day !
Housing prices going up, up, and up ?, yup!
Dustin toodough on the way out ?, yup!
Cranky, wall eyed "old stock" canadians not dealing well with mass imigration ?, yup!
walleyed?, cow eyed?, definitely startled!, but generaly not mean and nasty, go Canada!
Euro origin beurocrats talking about new zealand?
yup!, buh by!
South aisians with some real grit, working in Iqaliuite ? yup!
Jamaicans working in the north woods, doing forestry or fish plant work?, yup
Which makes it possible that I could encounter both of my favorite accents conversing, Jamaican
and Newfy.
I supose that in.a way, Canada is doing a mass imigration "melting pot" thing like what the US did long ago, which did actualy turn out well for the US, so
In Canada, one cannot lump all immigrants together even those from the same part of the world. Canada used to be pretty strict on immigration only allowing highly skilled individuals from all over the world. But in the last decade this has changed to just importing as many bodies as possible. I won't go into the reasons for this change but it has dramatically altered the character of the country in this time. We have…
Canada is in a demographic crisis: The birthrate is too low, the population is aging and the country can’t afford to provide people with all of the social benefits AND have no laborers paying in to the benefit system. Importing lots of young labor rebalances the demographics and bolsters funding of benefits, at the expense of a housing crisis and social tensions. The alternative is to deeply cut benefits, which is po…
How is this largely under-educated, low-skill workforce working menial/minimum wage jobs going to rescue the entitlements system? Canada's Southern neighbor has a similar issue: despite what may be morally correct, it's been a net negative for taxpayers, and the US doesn't have near the number of expensive social programs.
> Europeans could learn from Canada how to allow immigration in a fashion that the population embraces rather than tolerates Clearly the author is ignorant. Canadians are sick of immigration. Young Canadians doubly so. Racism is becoming more acceptable by the day.
Can I ask you to explain how and why it is acceptable to you that people in Canada would be opposed to having foreigners imposed upon them against their will and then you just dismiss their wishes and justified anger about such abuses by using a preprinted trigger command that justifies abusing them further by uttering the letters/sound of “racism”? Is it racism if all Canadians en masse, just up and moved to, e.g.,…
That's because those immigrants came here because they wanted to be Canadians. These new immigrants have no desire to integrate.
Idk the Amish are pretty chill for not integrating. And if immigrants come and integrate into existing gang culture, would you actually be happy? I think it is ok to just say “we don’t want poor immigrants. We want immigrants with something to offer.”
As an immigrant in Canada, I have observed a relentless increase in anti-immigration discourse. While there are valid critiques of current immigration policies, the conversation too often carries a racist undertone.
Yeah, there are surely aspects of the immigration program(s) to criticize, but the racism aspect has been either totally unchanged or decreased over time, from my observation. Though, maybe that's unsurprising considering: "Vancouver is one of the most ethnically and linguistically diverse cities in Canada: 49.3 percent of its residents are not native English speakers, 47.8 percent are native speakers of neither Engl…
In a, maybe not worst case, but really bad case, where there is violent conflict between the west and the PRC, how mught that play out in BC? My understanding is that a large portion of that 54.5% are from there? In the US during ww2 many Japanese business and land holdings were nationalized and then auctioned off to local business people. It seems like a work of fiction now, but such things have precedent.
Canada will do much better joining US (and distancing itself from declining EU and its disastrous policies). The US is much better managed; the results speak for themselves.
The opposite would be better for the US. If the US joined Canada, they could benefit from universal healthcare, schooling, and responsible gun laws within a short period of time, given the available resources that would be added to the Canadian system.
I want American and Canadian healthcare both to remain the way they are, I have timely access to care with my American health insurance, but if I lose my job I can get healthcare anyways with my Canadian passport
The biggest problem with the EU is that it is built for bureaucrats and as such it is geared towards irreversible "blob" decisions. Brexit should have been a near no-op. But it was a huge pain. They hadn't even planned for it or thought about it. EU should have a pre-memeber clearing state that countries stay in and then vote every year or n years to be "in" or "out" of the EU. But part of being in the EU should be t…
> EU should have a pre-memeber clearing state that countries stay in and then vote every year or n years to be "in" or "out" of the EU. But part of being in the EU should be to maintain non-in versions of all policies so that members can actually negotiate and easily leave without having huge bureaucratic cost.