A path to O1 open source • Hacker News Board

Re: A path to O1 open source

#11

Post by chefandy » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:15 PM UTC

It seems to me that for the most capable and useful models, openness almost exclusively benefits businesses, or maybe academic organizations with money for serious hardware. I know what I can run on my 4090 at home but the results pale in comparison to the commercial services. I see why people consider these matters important from a theoretical standpoint but from a practical standpoint it doesn’t seem particularly consequential. I self-host a few FOSS server applications that are primarily sold as SaaS subscriptions, and folks are often very critical of those businesses benefitting from the “open source” label because they’re often seemingly deliberately difficult to self-host. This seems to be an order of magnitude less open than that. Is there some use case for people with reasonable hardware that I’m just not aware of?

Re: A path to O1 open source

#12

Post by Oarch » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:16 PM UTC

mdaniel wrote: post #10

jbegley wrote: post #7

lmao at “learining” being misspelled in the first sentence

In these times, how else does one expect to advurtise that theeir text was not geeenerated by an LLM?

Excessive profanity could be a fun way to prove human authors!

Re: A path to O1 open source

#13

Post by Oras » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:17 PM UTC

First line in the abstract

> OpenAI o1 represents a significant milestone in Artificial Inteiligence,

Inteiligence

Safe to say OpenAI has nothing to worry about

Re: A path to O1 open source

#14

Post by HarHarVeryFunny » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:18 PM UTC

Sounds about right.

How long until we see DeepSeek-o1 ?

Re: A path to O1 open source

#15

Post by mig39 » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:20 PM UTC

Is this a joke? Why are there so many spelling mistakes? "Inteiligence" "challanging" “learining”

What is going on?

Re: A path to O1 open source

#16

Post by elashri » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:21 PM UTC

HarHarVeryFunny wrote: post #14

Sounds about right. How long until we see DeepSeek-o1 ?

There is DeepSeek-R1 where they have R1-lite preview version available for testing on their chat website.

Re: A path to O1 open source

#17

Post by [deleted] » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:21 PM UTC

fuddle wrote: post #3

It's ironic that they are attempting to open source a model from "OpenAI".

[deleted]

Re: A path to O1 open source

#18

Post by yencabulator » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:21 PM UTC

Oras wrote: post #13

First line in the abstract > OpenAI o1 represents a significant milestone in Artificial Inteiligence, Inteiligence Safe to say OpenAI has nothing to worry about

It's amazingly bad.

> the main techinique behinds o1 is the reinforcement learining.

Re: A path to O1 open source

#19

Post by melvinmelih » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:22 PM UTC

mig39 wrote: post #15

Is this a joke? Why are there so many spelling mistakes? "Inteiligence" "challanging" “learining” What is going on?

> Zhiyuan Zeng, Qinyuan Cheng, Zhangyue Yin, Bo Wang, Shimin Li, Yunhua Zhou, Qipeng Guo, Xuanjing Huang, Xipeng Qiu

I'm guessing English isn't their first language.

Re: A path to O1 open source

#20

Post by yencabulator » Fri, Jan 03, 2025, 11:23 PM UTC

Oarch wrote: post #12

mdaniel wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In these times, how else does one expect to advurtise that theeir text was not geeenerated by an LLM?

Excessive profanity could be a fun way to prove human authors!

CUSSTCHA

Curse-Using Social Scoring Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart