> Our team is ex-OpenAI, Anthropic, and Asana research scientists and AI engineers The page includes the logos of those companies. Is it normal to do that for companies one used to work for?
No it's not! These are probably imposters anyway. Apparently, you can buy HN upvotes... I find it hard to believe that honest researchers from frontier labs would behave like crypto scammers.
We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
41–50 of 79 posts
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#42Hi HN! We worked at OpenAI and Anthropic and believe we can provide much higher quality code generation by fine-tuning an LLM on your codebase compared to Sonnet-3.5 or o1 but not fine-tuned. Let me know if you are interested and we can fine-tune for you for free to test.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#43Hi HN! We worked at OpenAI and Anthropic and believe we can provide much higher quality code generation by fine-tuning an LLM on your codebase compared to Sonnet-3.5 or o1 but not fine-tuned. Let me know if you are interested and we can fine-tune for you for free to test.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#44> Our team is ex-OpenAI, Anthropic, and Asana research scientists and AI engineers The page includes the logos of those companies. Is it normal to do that for companies one used to work for?
Easier to land investors and customers if you have the "correct" pedigree.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's CoT?
Chain of Thought. When I see people using abbreviations like this I sometimes jokingly wonder what they do with all this time they're saving.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
No it's not! These are probably imposters anyway. Apparently, you can buy HN upvotes... I find it hard to believe that honest researchers from frontier labs would behave like crypto scammers.
It’s also weird that there is no about page naming the founders.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#47> Our team is ex-OpenAI, Anthropic, and Asana research scientists and AI engineers The page includes the logos of those companies. Is it normal to do that for companies one used to work for?
I've seen plenty of startups who's single-page includes the pitch, and the founders section which has big logos of their alma mater (almost always Ivy leaguers + Stanford) and whatever FAANG or consulting job gig they had previously. Easier to land investors and customers if you have the "correct" pedigree.
It seems this team is using the old scammy marketing trick of using logos of every company you can claim any possible relationship with as a way of building trust. Plastering giant logos on a product website implies some endorsement or affiliation to most casual readers. It’s not until you read all of the text that you realize this is just a list of companies they worked at.
This is the kind of behavior that earns a sternly worded letter from corporate council. You shouldn’t expect to be able to leave a company and then put their logo on your product page.
Re: We fine-tuned Llama and got 4.2x Sonnet 3.5 accuracy for code generation
#48Hi HN! We worked at OpenAI and Anthropic and believe we can provide much higher quality code generation by fine-tuning an LLM on your codebase compared to Sonnet-3.5 or o1 but not fine-tuned. Let me know if you are interested and we can fine-tune for you for free to test.