Meetings should be emails Youtube content should be a blog React websites should be static with sprinkles of vanilla JS etc These are all ideas that in many cases are true, though sometimes they aren't, but if you ask the right questions, usually those holding the line have a financial incentive.
I look at these things as essentially aesthetic preferences. There's certainly cases where a certain medium is the objectively right one for a task, but there's many others where it really just a matter of taste.
Every single piece of art, music, game or any other creative piece, has three things to it. One, the actual artifact itself of the music, the art and the game. Second is who is making it. And the third is how much have they put into it.
This last point I think matters a lot. As producing things gets easier and easier, just because almost all of creative art is a popularity contest, things will move towards who has put in most of their hearts / effort into it.
And that is why still I think we will always remember a desktop game such as Stardew Valley but never a web game, no matter how good it is. I mean Roblox has been around for a while and maybe I can tell you one or two games in their entire history, which I even remember.
The same with movies from Netflix which are becoming this data oriented, aesthetically pleasing, easy to watch things, but none of them are worth remembering. Will Netflix and these platforms keep growing and having more and more users? Sure.
But therein lies the conundrum. We will have a lot of everything. We will own none of it and our lives will grow more and more shallow and meaningless.