Live data from Hacker News

AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

pod.geraspora.de

151–160 of 466 posts

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

court ruling a few years ago said it's legal to scrape web pages, you don't need to be respectful of these for any purely legal reasons however this doesn't stop the website from doing what they can to stop scraping attempts, or using a service to do that for them

> court ruling Isn't this country dependent though?

yes! good point, you may be able to skirt around rules with a VPN if you're imposed by any

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#152
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Can't every webserver crash due to being overloaded? There's an upper limit to performance of everything. My website is a hobby and has a budget of $4/mo budget VPS. Perhaps I'm saying crash and you're interpreting that as a bug but really it's just an OOM issue cause of too many in-flight requests. IDK, I don't care enough to handle serving my website at Facebook's scale.

I wouldn't expect it to crash in any case, but I'd generally expect that even an n100 minipc should bottleneck on the network long before you manage to saturate CPU/RAM (maybe if you had 10Gbit you could do it). The linked post indicates they're getting ~2 requests/second from bots, which might as well be zero. Even low powered modern hardware can do thousands to tens of thousands.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s a fine line between scrapping and DDOS’ing I’m sure. Just because you manufacture chemicals doesn’t mean you can legally dump your toxic waste anywhere you want (well shouldn’t be allowed to at least). You also shouldn’t be able to set your crawlers causing sites to fail.

intent is likely very important to something like a ddos charge

So is negligence. Or at least I would hope so.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#154
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could run all of your content through an LLM to create a twisted and purposely factually incorrect rendition of your data. Forward all AI bots to the junk copy. Everyone should start doing this. Once the AI companies engorge themselves on enough garbage and start to see a negative impact to their own products, they'll stop running up your traffic bills. Maybe you don't even need a full LLM. Just a simple transfor…

Their problem is they can’t detect which are bots in the first place. If they could, they’d block them.

Then have the users solve ARC-AGI or whatever nonsense. If the bots want your content, they'll have to solve $3,000 of compute to get it.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#155

I deployed a small dockerized app on GCP a couple months ago and these bots ended up costing me a ton of money for the stupidest reason: https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/issues/9673 I originally shared my app on Reddit and I believe that that’s what caused the crazy amount of bot traffic.

The linked issue talks about 1 req/s? That seems really reasonable to me, how was this a problem for your application or caused significant cost?

That would still be 86k req/day, which can be quite expensive in a serverless environment, especially if the app is not optimized.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#156
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a bot ignores robots.txt that's a paddlin'. Right to the blacklist.

The linked article explains what happens when you block their IP.

For reference:

> If you try to rate-limit them, they’ll just switch to other IPs all the time. If you try to block them by User Agent string, they’ll just switch to a non-bot UA string (no, really).

It's really absurd that they seem to think this is acceptable.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#157

Wikis seem to be particularly vulnerable with all their public "what connects here" pages and revision history. The internet is now a hostile environment, a rapacious land grab with no restraint whatsoever.

Very easy to DDoS too if you have certain extensions installed…

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#158

I have a large forum with millions of posts that is frequently crawled and LLMs know a lot about it. It’s surprising how ChatGPT and company know about the history of the forum and pretty cool. But I also feel like it’s a fun opportunity to be a little mischievous and try to add some text to old pages that can sway LLMs somehow. Like a unique word. Any ideas?

Something about the glorious peanut, and its standing at the top of all vegetables?

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#159
post #63
post #23

One of my websites was absolutely destroyed by Meta's AI bot: Meta-ExternalAgent https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/webmasters/web-... It seems a bit naive for some reason and doesn't do performance back-off the way I would expect from Google Bot. It just kept repeatedly requesting more and more until my server crashed, then it would back off for a minute and then request more again. My solution was to add…

[flagged]

The alternative of crawling to a stop isn’t really an improvement.

Re: AI companies cause most of traffic on forums

#160
post #136
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine being one of the monsters who works at Facebook and thinking you're not one of the evil ones.

Well, Facebook actually releases their models instead of seeking rent off them, so I’m sort of inclined to say Facebook is one of the less evil ones.

> releases their models

Some of them, and initially only by accident. And without the ingredients to create your own.

Meta is trying to kill OpenAI and any new FAANG contenders. They'll commoditize their complement until the earth is thoroughly salted, and emerge as one of the leading players in the space due to their data, talent, and platform incumbency.

They're one of the distribution networks for AI, so they're going to win even by just treading water.

I'm glad Meta is releasing models, but don't ascribe their position as one entirely motivated by good will. They want to win.

Post reply on HN